Coetzee K, Menkveld R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Stellenbosch and Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa.
Arch Androl. 2001 Apr-Jun;47(2):153-6. doi: 10.1080/014850101316901361.
In a routine prospective study, 3 different counting chambers were compared for manual and computer-assisted evaluations. Swim-up samples were used so as to remove all debris and other cells that may contaminate the evaluation process when using a semen analyzer. The Makler concentration determinations (n = 20) were, on average. approximately 20 x 10(6) cells/mL higher compared to the corresponding 20 hemocytometer counts. The mean differences between the Leja chambers and the hemocytometer counts (n = 320) were only around 1 x 10(6) cells/mL, with coefficients of variation around 20%. The Leja chambers for both manual and the computer-assisted sperm concentration determinations provided consistent and accurate data on sperm concentration.
在一项常规前瞻性研究中,对3种不同的计数室进行了比较,用于手动和计算机辅助评估。使用上游法样本以去除使用精液分析仪时可能污染评估过程的所有碎片和其他细胞。Makler浓度测定(n = 20)平均而言,与相应的20次血细胞计数器计数相比,约高20×10⁶个细胞/毫升。Leja计数室与血细胞计数器计数之间的平均差异(n = 320)仅约为1×10⁶个细胞/毫升,变异系数约为20%。用于手动和计算机辅助精子浓度测定的Leja计数室提供了关于精子浓度的一致且准确的数据。