Naismith S L, Hickie I B, Scott E M, Davenport T A
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Med J Aust. 2001 Jul 16;175(S1):S42-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143789.x.
To evaluate the effects of a seminar-based training program and clinical practice audit on general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge and management of common mental disorders.
Survey of GPs' knowledge before and after training, and clinical practice audit and re-audit after feedback.
GP volunteers from around Australia in 1998-1999: 1008 completed the pre-training test, 190 the post-training test, 386 the first audit (33235 patients), and 157 of these the re-audit (13280 patients), with 57 undertaking both audit and training.
Four-seminar, 12-hour training program focused on improving GPs' capacity to identify and manage patients with depression and anxiety; practice audit with patient- and practice-based feedback on diagnosis and treatment of common mental disorders.
Scores on pre- and post-training knowledge tests; self-rated improvements in confidence in managing patients with mental disorders after training; rates of psychological diagnoses and treatment by GPs on first audit and re-audit.
GPs' knowledge of pharmacological treatments and clinical management improved after the training program (P<0.001), and 97% of GPs reported increased confidence in their management skills. GPs who undertook training had higher diagnosis rates for common mental disorders in the first audit than those who did not undertake training (36% versus 29%; P<0.001), and their diagnosis rates increased over time (36% to 39%; P<0.01), while those of GPs who did not undertake training were unchanged. Similarly, GPs who undertook training provided more mental health treatments than those who did not (30% versus 27% in the first audit [P<0.001], and 31% versus 24% at reaudit [P<0.001]). They also place greater emphasis on use of nonpharmacological treatments (24% versus 21% at first audit [P<0.001], and 25% versus 19% at re-audit [P<0.001]).
Clinical audits may heighten awareness of mental disorders, but, on their own, they do not improve mental health practice. A relatively brief but skills-based training program may contribute to better management of patients with common mental disorders by increasing GPs' confidence and competence.
评估基于研讨会的培训项目及临床实践审核对全科医生(GP)关于常见精神障碍的知识及管理能力的影响。
对全科医生培训前后的知识进行调查,并在反馈后进行临床实践审核及重新审核。
1998 - 1999年来自澳大利亚各地的全科医生志愿者:1008人完成了培训前测试,190人完成了培训后测试,386人参与了首次审核(涉及33235名患者),其中157人参与了重新审核(涉及13280名患者),57人既参与了审核又参加了培训。
为期四个研讨会、共12小时的培训项目,重点在于提高全科医生识别和管理抑郁症及焦虑症患者的能力;进行实践审核,并基于患者和实践对常见精神障碍的诊断及治疗提供反馈。
培训前后知识测试的分数;培训后自我评定的管理精神障碍患者信心的提高情况;全科医生在首次审核和重新审核时心理诊断及治疗的比例。
培训项目后,全科医生在药物治疗及临床管理方面的知识有所提高(P<0.001),97%的全科医生报告其管理技能的信心增强。参加培训的全科医生在首次审核中对常见精神障碍的诊断率高于未参加培训的医生(36%对29%;P<0.001),且其诊断率随时间上升(36%至39%;P<·01),而未参加培训的全科医生的诊断率未变。同样,参加培训的全科医生提供的心理健康治疗比未参加培训的医生更多(首次审核中为30%对27% [P<0.001],重新审核时为31%对24% [P<0.001])。他们也更加强调使用非药物治疗(首次审核时为·4%对21% [P<0.001],重新审核时为25%对19% [P<0.001])。
临床审核可能会提高对精神障碍的认识,但仅凭其自身并不能改善心理健康实践。一个相对简短但基于技能的培训项目可能通过增强全科医生的信心和能力,有助于更好地管理常见精神障碍患者。