Alm P., Gudmundsson T., Mårtensson R., Anderson H., Horvath G., Högberg T.
Department of Pathology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Southern Swedish Regional Tumor Registry, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995 Mar;5(2):87-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05020087.x.
A large, consecutive series of 562 patients with endometrial adenocarcinomas was investigated with respect to prognostic factors. In the histopathologic evaluation the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system was used. In addition to that, in moderately differentiated (MD) tumors small areas of solid growth were identified and the proportions of these out of the whole areas of tumor (in the predominant number of cases this being less than 5%) were later determined by morphometry, showing a good accordance with the subjective estimations. Differentiated tumors with small solid areas (MD + S tumors) implied a significantly worse prognosis compared to tumors without a solid component (P < 0.001), which was also confirmed in a multivariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis MD+S differentiation had an independent prognostic impact, as strong as age, clinical stage and myometrial invasion. It is suggested that the occurrence of even a very small solid component is an ominous sign, the presence (or absence) of which might be an important parameter to take into consideration in the discrimination between high- and low-risk endometrial carcinomas.
对一大组连续的562例子宫内膜腺癌患者进行了预后因素调查。在组织病理学评估中,采用了世界卫生组织(WHO)分类系统。此外,在中分化(MD)肿瘤中识别出小面积的实性生长区域,随后通过形态计量学确定这些区域在肿瘤总面积中所占的比例(在大多数病例中,该比例小于5%),结果显示与主观估计高度一致。与无实性成分的肿瘤相比,具有小面积实性区域的分化型肿瘤(MD + S肿瘤)预后明显更差(P < 0.001),多因素分析也证实了这一点。在多因素分析中,MD+S分化具有独立的预后影响,其影响程度与年龄、临床分期和肌层浸润相同。研究表明,即使存在非常小的实性成分也是一个不祥之兆,其存在(或不存在)可能是区分高风险和低风险子宫内膜癌时需要考虑的一个重要参数。