Hall J S, French R, Morris T J, Stenger D C
Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA.
J Virol. 2001 Nov;75(21):10231-43. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10231-10243.2001.
Variation within the Type and Sidney 81 strains of wheat streak mosaic virus was assessed by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. Limiting-dilution subisolates (LDSIs) of each strain were evaluated for polymorphism in the P1, P3, NIa, and CP cistrons. Different SSCP patterns among LDSIs of a strain were associated with single-nucleotide substitutions. Sidney 81 LDSI-S10 was used as founding inoculum to establish three lineages each in wheat, corn, and barley. The P1, HC-Pro, P3, CI, NIa, NIb, and CP cistrons of LDSI-S10 and each lineage at passages 1, 3, 6, and 9 were evaluated for polymorphism. By passage 9, each lineage differed in consensus sequence from LDSI-S10. The majority of substitutions occurred within NIa and CP, although at least one change occurred in each cistron except HC-Pro and P3. Most consensus sequence changes among lineages were independent, with substitutions accumulating over time. However, LDSI-S10 bore a variant nucleotide (G(6016)) in NIa that was restored to A(6016) in eight of nine lineages by passage 6. This near-global reversion is most easily explained by selection. Examination of nonconsensus variation revealed a pool of unique substitutions (singletons) that remained constant in frequency during passage, regardless of the host species examined. These results suggest that mutations arising by viral polymerase error are generated at a constant rate but that most newly generated mutants are sequestered in virions and do not serve as replication templates. Thus, a substantial fraction of variation generated is static and has yet to be tested for relative fitness. In contrast, nonsingleton variation increased upon passage, suggesting that some mutants do serve as replication templates and may become established in a population. Replicated mutants may or may not rise to prominence to become the consensus sequence in a lineage, with the fate of any particular mutant subject to selection and stochastic processes such as genetic drift and population growth factors.
通过单链构象多态性(SSCP)分析评估了小麦条纹花叶病毒(Wheat streak mosaic virus)的类型株和Sidney 81株内的变异,并通过核苷酸测序进行了确认。对每个株系的有限稀释亚分离物(LDSIs)进行了P1、P3、NIa和CP顺反子多态性评估。一个株系的LDSIs之间不同的SSCP模式与单核苷酸替换有关。Sidney 81 LDSI-S10被用作起始接种物,在小麦、玉米和大麦中分别建立了三个谱系。对LDSI-S10以及传代1、3、6和9时每个谱系的P1、HC-Pro、P3、CI、NIa、NIb和CP顺反子进行了多态性评估。到传代9时,每个谱系的共有序列与LDSI-S10不同。大多数替换发生在NIa和CP内,尽管除了HC-Pro和P3外,每个顺反子中至少发生了一个变化。谱系间大多数共有序列变化是独立的,替换随时间积累。然而,LDSI-S10的NIa中有一个变异核苷酸(G(6016)),到传代6时,九个谱系中有八个将其恢复为A(6016)。这种近乎全局的回复最容易用选择来解释。对非共有变异的检查揭示了一组独特的替换(单例),其频率在传代过程中保持不变,无论所检查宿主物种如何。这些结果表明,由病毒聚合酶错误产生的突变以恒定速率产生,但大多数新产生的突变体被隔离在病毒粒子中,不作为复制模板。因此,产生的大部分变异是静态的,尚未进行相对适应性测试。相反,非单例变异在传代时增加,表明一些突变体确实作为复制模板,并可能在种群中固定下来。复制的突变体可能会或可能不会成为谱系中的共有序列而突出,任何特定突变体的命运取决于选择以及诸如遗传漂变和种群增长因素等随机过程。