Zeng X, Kaplan S
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Bacteriol. 2001 Nov;183(21):6355-64. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6355-6364.2001.
The TspO outer membrane protein of Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been shown to be involved in controlling the transcription of a number of genes which encode enzymes involved in photopigment biosynthesis and the puc operon. The display of regulated genes appears identical to those genes encompassing the PpsR/AppA repressor/antirepressor regulon, although the effect of TspO is modest relative to that of PpsR/AppA. To directly address the hypothesis that TspO is effective through the PpsR/AppA system, we constructed mutant strains with mutations in both tspO and appA. In all cases, the phenotypes examined resembled those of the appA lesion by itself, leading us to conclude that TspO works through or modulates the PpsR/AppA system and acts upstream of the site of action of these regulatory proteins. In earlier publications, we had suggested that TspO is involved in the efflux of a certain intermediate(s) of the porphyrin biosynthesis pathway and that transcriptional regulation of target gene expression could be explained by the accumulation of a coactivator of AppA function. Although the data reported here do not precisely identify this coactivator, they lend support to this hypothesis. We discuss the importance of this form of gene control as the result of the recent extension of the TspO system to Sinorhizobium meliloti, as described by Davey and de Bruijn (M. E. Davey and F. J. de Bruijn, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:5353-5359, 2000). It is therefore possible that this system constitutes a more widely, although not universally, demonstrated form of gene regulation.
球形红杆菌的TspO外膜蛋白已被证明参与控制许多基因的转录,这些基因编码参与光合色素生物合成的酶和puc操纵子。尽管TspO的作用相对于PpsR/AppA来说较为适度,但受调控基因的表现与那些包含PpsR/AppA阻遏物/抗阻遏物调节子的基因相同。为了直接验证TspO通过PpsR/AppA系统发挥作用这一假设,我们构建了tspO和appA都发生突变的突变菌株。在所有情况下,所检测的表型都类似于单独的appA损伤所导致的表型,这使我们得出结论,TspO通过PpsR/AppA系统起作用或对其进行调节,并在这些调节蛋白的作用位点上游发挥作用。在早期的出版物中,我们曾提出TspO参与卟啉生物合成途径中某种中间产物的外排,并且靶基因表达的转录调控可以用AppA功能的共激活剂的积累来解释。尽管此处报道的数据并未精确鉴定出这种共激活剂,但它们为这一假设提供了支持。正如Davey和de Bruijn所描述的(M. E. Davey和F. J. de Bruijn,《应用与环境微生物学》66:5353 - 5359,2000年),由于最近TspO系统扩展到了苜蓿中华根瘤菌,我们讨论了这种基因控制形式的重要性。因此,尽管并非普遍存在,但这种系统可能构成了一种更广泛的基因调控形式。