Mikalsen A, Bertelsen B, Flaten M A
Department of Psychology, SV-Fak., University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Oct;157(4):373-80. doi: 10.1007/s002130100841.
To test the classical conditioning and expectancy theories of placebo effects.
Two experiments investigated whether administration of caffeine-associated stimuli elicited conditioned arousal, and whether information that a drink contained or did not contain caffeine modulated arousal.
Experiment 1 (n=21) used a 2 Caffeine (0 and 2 mg/kg) x 2 Solution (Coffee, Juice) x 2 Information (Told caffeine, Told not-caffeine) within-subjects design. Experiment 2 (n=48) used a 2 Solution (Coffee, Orange juice) x 3 Information (Told caffeine, Told not-caffeine, No information) between-subjects design. Indexes of arousal were skin conductance responses and levels, startle eyeblink reflexes, cardiovascular measures, and the Bond and Lader 1974 mood scale.
Caffeine-associated stimuli increased alertness, contentedness and skin conductance levels, and information that the drink contained caffeine decreased calmness in Experiment 1. However, unexpected information about the caffeine content of the drink, and the order of the conditions, could have masked some effects of the experimental manipulations. Experiment 2 followed up this hypothesis. The results showed a conditioned increase in startle eyeblink reflexes, and that caffeine-associated stimuli together with information that the drink contained caffeine increased contentedness.
Caffeine-associated stimuli increased arousal, and information about the content of the drink modulated arousal in the direction indicated by the information. Thus, both the classical conditioning and expectancy theories of placebo effects received support, and placebo effects were strongest when both conditioned responses and expectancy-based responses acted in the same direction.
检验安慰剂效应的经典条件作用理论和预期理论。
两项实验探究了与咖啡因相关的刺激物的给药是否引发条件性唤醒,以及关于一种饮料含有或不含有咖啡因的信息是否会调节唤醒。
实验1(n = 21)采用2咖啡因(0和2毫克/千克)×2溶液(咖啡、果汁)×2信息(告知含咖啡因、告知不含咖啡因)的被试内设计。实验2(n = 48)采用2溶液(咖啡、橙汁)×3信息(告知含咖啡因、告知不含咖啡因、无信息)的被试间设计。唤醒指标包括皮肤电传导反应和水平、惊跳眨眼反射、心血管指标以及1974年邦德和莱德情绪量表。
在实验1中,与咖啡因相关的刺激物提高了警觉性、满足感和皮肤电传导水平,且告知饮料含咖啡因的信息降低了平静程度。然而,关于饮料咖啡因含量的意外信息以及条件顺序可能掩盖了实验操作的一些效果。实验2对这一假设进行了跟进。结果显示惊跳眨眼反射有条件性增加,且与咖啡因相关的刺激物加上告知饮料含咖啡因的信息提高了满足感。
与咖啡因相关的刺激物增加了唤醒,且关于饮料成分的信息按照信息所指示的方向调节了唤醒。因此,安慰剂效应的经典条件作用理论和预期理论均得到了支持,且当条件反应和基于预期的反应方向相同时,安慰剂效应最强。