Durbach N
Department of History, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Soc Hist Med. 2000 Apr;13(1):45-62. doi: 10.1093/shm/13.1.45.
From its origins in resistance to the 1853 Compulsory Vaccination Act, the Victorian anti-vaccination movement successfully challenged the public health policies of an increasingly interventionist state. Anti-vaccinationists were not only middle-class reformers, but were also drawn from a politically active working class. These campaigners saw compulsory vaccination as an extreme example of class legislation, for its policy and administration implicitly targeted working-class infants and inflicted multiple penalties on a public who considered themselves 'conscientious objectors'. Anti-vaccinationism was quickly absorbed into English working-class culture. Indeed, it helped to reorganize working-class identities around the site of the vulnerable body thereby absorbing many people into a working class who interpreted the violation of their bodies as a form of political tyranny. Participation in this movement was, however, also an exclusive exercise for anti-vaccinators, as respectable working-class citizens distinguished themselves from members of the 'undeserving' classes. This paper explores the class nature of the Vaccination Acts, their relationship to the New Poor Law, and the political implications of their administration. It also imbeds anti-vaccinationism firmly within working-class culture, illustrating the campaign's relationship to popular protest and entertainment, and this legislation's impact upon working-class bodies.
从起源于对1853年《强制接种疫苗法案》的抵制开始,维多利亚时代的反疫苗接种运动成功挑战了日益干预主义的国家的公共卫生政策。反疫苗接种者不仅包括中产阶级改革者,还来自政治上活跃的工人阶级。这些活动家将强制接种疫苗视为阶级立法的极端例子,因为其政策和管理含蓄地针对工人阶级婴儿,并对自认为是“出于良心拒服兵役者”的公众施加多重惩罚。反疫苗接种主义很快融入了英国工人阶级文化。事实上,它有助于围绕易受伤害的身体部位重新构建工人阶级身份认同,从而将许多人纳入工人阶级,这些人将对他们身体的侵犯视为一种政治暴政形式。然而,参与这场运动对反疫苗接种者来说也是一种排他性的行为,因为体面的工人阶级公民将自己与“不值得同情”的阶级成员区分开来。本文探讨了《疫苗接种法案》的阶级性质、它们与《新济贫法》的关系以及其管理的政治影响。它还将反疫苗接种主义牢固地融入工人阶级文化中,阐明了该运动与民众抗议和娱乐的关系,以及这项立法对工人阶级身体的影响。