Suppr超能文献

人类胚胎克隆的监管模式:自由市场、专业准则与政府限制。

Regulatory models for human embryo cloning: the free market, professional guidelines, and government restrictions.

作者信息

Annas George J

出版信息

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Sep;4(3):235-49. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0039.

Abstract

Both experimental and therapeutic uses of the new reproductive technologies have been governed not by the medical ideology of the best interests of patients and their children, but by the market ideology of profit maximization under the guise of "reproductive liberty." Government in our constitutional, democratic society has the authority and obligation to make and enforce reasonable regulations to manage the new reproductive market in order to protect the interests of the public, prospective parents, and their future children. The "cloning" debate provides a useful opportunity to compare and contrast the competing regulatory models of the free market, professional guidelines, and government restrictions.

摘要

新的生殖技术的实验性和治疗性用途一直以来并非受患者及其子女最大利益的医学理念所支配,而是受“生殖自由”幌子下利润最大化的市场理念所左右。在我们的立宪民主社会中,政府有权且有义务制定并执行合理的规章制度,以管理新的生殖市场,从而保护公众、准父母及其未来子女的利益。“克隆”辩论提供了一个有益的契机,用以比较和对照自由市场、专业准则及政府限制这几种相互竞争的监管模式。

相似文献

2
Unmanaged care: the need to regulate new reproductive technologies in the United States.
Bioethics. 1997 Jul-Oct;11(3-4):348-65. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00075.
3
Groups set up panel on use of fetal tissue.
N Y Times Web. 1991 Jan 8:C3.
4
Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
Fertil Steril. 1986 Sep;46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S.
5
Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
Fertil Steril. 1990 Jun;53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S.
6
Human embryos and genetic testing: a private policy model.
Politics Life Sci. 1992 Feb;11(1):53-62. doi: 10.1017/s0730938400017202.
7
Report on human cloning through embryo splitting: an amber light.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Sep;4(3):251-82. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0067.
8
Liberty, identity, and human cloning.
Tex Law Rev. 1998 May;76(6):1371-456.
9
Canada could ban some reproductive technologies.
BMJ. 1994 Jan 15;308(6922):154-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6922.154a.
10
A house divided.
Washington Post. 1997 Oct 12:12-17, 24-29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of the clonal man: inventing science unfiction.
J Med Humanit. 2000 Fall;21(3):159-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1009078620330.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验