Annas George J
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Sep;4(3):235-49. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0039.
Both experimental and therapeutic uses of the new reproductive technologies have been governed not by the medical ideology of the best interests of patients and their children, but by the market ideology of profit maximization under the guise of "reproductive liberty." Government in our constitutional, democratic society has the authority and obligation to make and enforce reasonable regulations to manage the new reproductive market in order to protect the interests of the public, prospective parents, and their future children. The "cloning" debate provides a useful opportunity to compare and contrast the competing regulatory models of the free market, professional guidelines, and government restrictions.
新的生殖技术的实验性和治疗性用途一直以来并非受患者及其子女最大利益的医学理念所支配,而是受“生殖自由”幌子下利润最大化的市场理念所左右。在我们的立宪民主社会中,政府有权且有义务制定并执行合理的规章制度,以管理新的生殖市场,从而保护公众、准父母及其未来子女的利益。“克隆”辩论提供了一个有益的契机,用以比较和对照自由市场、专业准则及政府限制这几种相互竞争的监管模式。