Weisz Victoria
Ethics Behav. 1992;2(3):185-201. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0203_4.
The only hope of survival for children with a number of life-threatening illnesses is a successful bone marrow transplant (BMT). Unlike the treatment source for most therapies, the raw material for transplant therapy comes from a human being. Although many BMTs are autologous, utilizing the patient's own bone marrow, a large percentage of childhood BMTs rely on bone marrow from children or adolescents who are biological siblings to the sick child. Medical and legal systems are confronted with a dilemma when healthy children are needed to undergo minimally risky, yet somewhat painful, procedures for the benefit of their critically ill siblings. This article reviews legal issues involved in sibling bone marrow donation and psychological research that is relevant to those issues. The article concludes with proposed directions for future psycholegal research and a discussion of ethical issues that are not amenable to empirical investigation.
对于患有多种危及生命疾病的儿童来说,成功进行骨髓移植(BMT)是他们生存的唯一希望。与大多数治疗方法的治疗来源不同,移植治疗的原材料来自人类。虽然许多骨髓移植是自体的,即利用患者自身的骨髓,但很大比例的儿童骨髓移植依赖于患病儿童的亲生兄弟姐妹(儿童或青少年)提供的骨髓。当需要健康儿童为了重病的兄弟姐妹接受风险极小但仍有些痛苦的程序时,医疗和法律系统面临着两难境地。本文回顾了同胞骨髓捐赠所涉及的法律问题以及与这些问题相关的心理学研究。文章最后提出了未来心理法学研究的方向,并讨论了无法通过实证研究解决的伦理问题。