Miles Steven H
Law Med Health Care. 1992 Winter;20(4):310-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01209.x.
"Medical futility" may be provisionally defined as a medical conclusion that a therapy is of no value to a patient and should not be prescribed. The current debate about medical futility is one of the most important and contentious in medical ethics. Proponents believe that allowing physicians to determine and withhold futile therapies can be done without disturbing the current paradigm of medical ethics which respects patient autonomy with regard to informed consent and the right to refuse treatment. Others conclude that medical futility is simply an unacceptable form of medical paternalism. Some adopt a middle position that doctors can predict medical futility; they believe that attempting this does not necessarily justify imposing decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy on patients. Regardless of its policy outcome, this important debate is leading to a reexamination of the nature of a patient's entitlement to health care and of the ends of medicine. It has two aspects. A definitional debate examines the concept of medical futility and its derived clinical criteria. A second debate considers the nature of the authority and procedures to act on the conclusion that a therapy is futile by withholding or withdrawing treatment.
“医疗无效”可暂行定义为一种医学结论,即某种治疗方法对患者毫无价值,不应予以开方使用。当前关于医疗无效的争论是医学伦理学中最重要且最具争议性的争论之一。支持者认为,允许医生判定并停止无效治疗,这样做不会扰乱当前尊重患者在知情同意和拒绝治疗权利方面的自主权的医学伦理范式。另一些人则得出结论,认为医疗无效不过是一种不可接受的家长式医疗形式。还有一些人采取中间立场,认为医生能够预测医疗无效;他们认为,尝试这样做并不一定就意味着有理由将放弃维持生命治疗的决定强加给患者。无论其政策结果如何,这场重要的争论正在促使人们重新审视患者获得医疗保健的权利的本质以及医学的目的。它有两个方面。一场定义性争论审视医疗无效的概念及其衍生的临床标准。另一场争论则考虑依据治疗无效的结论通过停止或撤销治疗来采取行动的权威机构和程序的性质。