Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
作者信息
Krauss Deborah J
出版信息
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1991;26(2):523-47.
PMID:11652068
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1991;26(2):523-47.
2
Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
Harv Law Rev. 1990 Apr;103(6):1325-43.
3
Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
Hastings Law J. 1992 Mar;43(3):569-614.
4
The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
Yale Law J. 1986 Jan;95(3):599-625.
5
Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Harv Womens Law J. 1987 Spring;10:9-58.
6
Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
Law Context. 1991;9:70-91.
7
Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
McGill Law J. 1995 Aug;40(4):947-91.
8
Mama vs. fetus.
Med Trial Tech Q. 1993;39(4):536-69.
9
Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
Rutgers Law Rev. 1989 Winter;41(2):591-623.
10
Substance abuse during pregnancy.
Harv Womens Law J. 1990 Spring;13:278-99.
Zotero 插件