The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
作者信息
Ballard Tracy
出版信息
Harv Womens Law J. 1993 Spring;16:139-87.
PMID:11652871
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The Norplant condition: one step forward or two steps back?
Harv Womens Law J. 1993 Spring;16:139-87.
2
Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev. 1992;11(2):359-83.
3
The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation.
Hastings Constit Law Q. 1992 Fall;20(1):207-46.
4
Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother.
Marriage Fam Rev. 1995;21(3-4):259-81. doi: 10.1300/j002v21n03_13.
5
The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control?
UCLA Law Rev. 1992 Oct;40(1):1-101.
6
Norplant: the new scarlet letter?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1992 Spring;8:201-26.
7
The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights?
J Leg Med. 1992 Jun;13(2):237-62. doi: 10.1080/01947649209510882.
8
Crime, race, and reproduction.
Tulane Law Rev. 1993 Jun;67(6):1945-77.
9
The creation and perpetuation of the mother/body myth: judicial and legislative enlistment of Norplant.
Buffalo Law Rev. 1993 Spring;41(2):703-77.
10
Whose choice is it, anyway?
N Y Times Web. 1991 Jan 28:A22.
Zotero 插件