Research ethics after World War II: the insular culture of biomedicine.
作者信息
Brandt Allan M, Freidenfelds Lara
出版信息
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):239-43. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0021.
PMID:11653395
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Research ethics after World War II: the insular culture of biomedicine.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):239-43. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0021.
2
Radiation.
JAMA. 1996 Aug 7;276(5):421-3.
3
Standards of accountability for consent in research.
Account Res. 1996;4(3-4):197-206. doi: 10.1080/08989629608573880.
4
Revising the history of Cold War research ethics.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):223-37. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0025.
5
Looking back and judging our predecessors.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):251-70. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0020.
6
The controversy over retrospective moral judgment.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):245-50. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0023.
7
Government guinea pigs.
N Y Times Web. 1994 Jan 9:E21.
8
In the name of national security: lessons from the final report on the human radiation experiments.
Eur J Health Law. 1999 Mar;6(1):7-23. doi: 10.1163/15718099920522659.
9
Disclosure and consent: through the Cold War prism.
Account Res. 1998 Jan;6(1-2):1-14. doi: 10.1080/08989629808573919.
10
Adding to the canon: the final report.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct;26(5):34-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Research under the GDPR - a level playing field for public and private sector research?
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021 Mar 1;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00111-z.
Zotero 插件