Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
作者信息
Potts Jeffrey
出版信息
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1992 Winter;86(2):453-96.
PMID:11659500
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1992 Winter;86(2):453-96.
2
Controlling conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient relationship: lessons from Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
Mercer Law Rev. 1991 Spring;42(3):989-1005.
3
Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
Food Drug Cosmet Law J. 1989 Jul;44(4):331-58.
4
Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J. 1989 Jun;5(2):211-61.
5
Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
UCLA Law Rev. 1986 Oct;34(1):207-64.
6
Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
Albany Law J Sci Technol. 1991;1:277-305.
7
Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
St Louis Univ Law J. 1991 Winter;35(2):433-62.
8
Moore v. The Regents of the University of California: an ethical debate on informed consent and property rights in a patient's cells.
J Pat Trademark Off Soc. 1995 Aug;77(8):611-39.
9
The commercialization of human tissue -- the source of legal, ethical and social problems: an area better suited to legislative resolution.
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev. 1990 Nov;24(1):115-69.
10
Research that could yield marketable products from human materials: the problem of informed consent.
IRB. 1986 Jan-Feb;8(1):6-7.
Zotero 插件