Blythe v. Seagraves: North Carolina treats the issue of whether a minor and her parents may legally consent to the minor's participation, as donor, in a kidney transplant.
作者信息
Herman David W
出版信息
North Carol Centr Law J. 1978 Spring;9(2):216-26.
PMID:11665114
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Blythe v. Seagraves: North Carolina treats the issue of whether a minor and her parents may legally consent to the minor's participation, as donor, in a kidney transplant.
North Carol Centr Law J. 1978 Spring;9(2):216-26.
2
Minor donor consent to transplant surgery: a review of the law.
Marquette Law Rev. 1978 Winter;62(2):149-69.
3
The minor transplant donor.
Ottawa Law Rev. 1975 Winter;7(1):85-105.
4
Parent can consent to use of healthy child as donor.
Pediatr News. 1974 Sep;8(9):46-7.
5
Health science research ethics and the law: research involving children.
NCBHR Commun. 1993 Nov-Dec;4(2):11-3.
6
Live organ donations between siblings and the best interest standard: time for stricter judicial intervention.
Ga State Univ Law Rev. 1994 Mar;10(3):589-613.
7
Advancing the rights of children and adolescents to be altruistic: bone marrow donation by minors.
J Law Health. 1994;9(2):213-45.
8
Curran v. Bosze: toward a clear standard for authorizing kidney and bone marrow transplants between minor siblings.
Vt Law Rev. 1992 Winter;16(2):499-539.
9
little v. Little: organ donations by incompetents and the benefits rule in Texas.
South Tex Law J. 1979;20(1):207-14.
10
Live organ and tissue transplants from minor donors in Massachusetts.
Boston Univ Law Rev. 1975 Mar;55(2):159-93.
Zotero 插件