Jahanshahi M, Rowe J, Fuller R
Department of Clinical Neurology, Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Oct;140(4):460-8. doi: 10.1007/s002210100847.
Imaging studies have reported impaired activation of the striatum and their frontal projection sites in dsytonia, areas which are considered to play a role in motor preparation, movement initiation and execution. The aim of this study was to investigate the processes of motor preparation, response initiation and execution in patients with idiopathic torsion dystonia (ITD). We assessed 12 patients with ITD and 12 age-matched controls on a number of reaction time (RT) tasks that differed in degree of motor preparation possible. Subjects performed a visual simple RT (SRT) task, an uncued four-choice reaction time (CRT) task and a fully precued four-choice RT task. A stimulus 1-stimulus 2 (S1-S2) paradigm was used. The warning signal/precue (S1) preceded the imperative stimulus (S2) by either 0 ms (no warning signal or precue) 200 ms, 800 ms, 1,600 ms or 3,200 ms. The patients with ITD had significantly slower RTs and movement times than normals across all RT tasks. The unwarned SRT trials were significantly faster than the uncued CRT trials for both groups. For both groups, precued CRTs were significantly faster than the uncued CRTs. The results show that while response initiation and execution are significantly slower in patients with ITD than normals, movement preparation is not quantitatively or qualitatively different. The results are discussed in relation to previous imaging, behavioural and electrophysiological studies and models of fronto-striatal dysfunction in ITD.
影像学研究报告称,肌张力障碍患者的纹状体及其额叶投射部位激活受损,这些区域被认为在运动准备、运动发起和执行中发挥作用。本研究的目的是调查特发性扭转性肌张力障碍(ITD)患者的运动准备、反应发起和执行过程。我们让12名ITD患者和12名年龄匹配的对照者完成了一些反应时间(RT)任务,这些任务在可能的运动准备程度上有所不同。受试者进行了视觉简单反应时间(SRT)任务、无提示四选反应时间(CRT)任务和完全提示四选反应时间任务。采用了刺激1 - 刺激2(S1 - S2)范式。警告信号/提示(S1)在指令刺激(S2)之前出现的时间为0毫秒(无警告信号或提示)、200毫秒、800毫秒、1600毫秒或3200毫秒。在所有RT任务中,ITD患者的反应时间和运动时间均显著慢于正常人。两组的无警告SRT试验均显著快于无提示CRT试验。对于两组而言,提示后的CRT均显著快于无提示的CRT。结果表明,虽然ITD患者的反应发起和执行明显慢于正常人,但运动准备在数量或质量上并无差异。结合之前关于ITD的影像学、行为学和电生理学研究以及额纹状体功能障碍模型对结果进行了讨论。