Suppr超能文献

肺癌筛查

Screening for lung cancer.

作者信息

Manser R L, Irving L B, Stone C, Byrnes G, Abramson M, Campbell D

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology and Health Service Evaluation Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001991.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with chest radiography, sputum cytology or spiral CT has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether screening for lung cancer using regular sputum examinations or chest radiography or CT chest reduces lung cancer mortality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases, bibliographies, hand searching of a journal and discussion with experts were used to identify published and unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled trials of screening for lung cancer using sputum examinations, chest radiography or CT chest.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Intention to screen analysis was performed. Where there was significant statistical heterogeneity relative risks were reported using the random effect model, but for other outcomes the fixed effect model was used.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials were included (6 randomised controlled studies and 1 non-randomised controlled trial) with a total of 245,610 subjects. There were no studies with an unscreened control group. Frequent screening with chest x-rays was associated with an 11% relative increase in mortality from lung cancer compared with less frequent screening (RR 1.11, CI: 1.00-1.23). A non statistically significant trend was observed to reduced mortality from lung cancer when screening with chest x-ray and sputum cytology was compared with chest x-ray alone (RR 0.88, CI:0.74-1.03). Several of the included studies had potential methodological weaknesses. There were no controlled studies of spiral CT.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence does not support screening for lung cancer with chest radiography or sputum cytology. Frequent chest x-ray screening might be harmful. Further, methodologically rigorous trials are required.

摘要

背景

胸部X线摄影、痰细胞学检查或螺旋CT筛查肺癌的有效性尚未得到证实。

目的

确定定期进行痰检、胸部X线摄影或胸部CT筛查肺癌是否能降低肺癌死亡率。

检索策略

利用电子数据库、文献目录、手工检索期刊以及与专家讨论来识别已发表和未发表的试验。

选择标准

采用痰检、胸部X线摄影或胸部CT筛查肺癌的对照试验。

数据收集与分析

进行意向性筛查分析。当存在显著统计学异质性时,使用随机效应模型报告相对风险,但对于其他结果则使用固定效应模型。

主要结果

纳入了7项试验(6项随机对照研究和1项非随机对照试验),共有245,610名受试者。没有未筛查对照组的研究。与较少频率的筛查相比,频繁进行胸部X线筛查与肺癌死亡率相对增加11%相关(RR 1.11,CI:1.00 - 1.23)。当将胸部X线和痰细胞学检查与单独胸部X线检查进行比较时,观察到肺癌死亡率降低的趋势,但无统计学意义(RR 0.88,CI:0.74 - 1.03)。纳入的几项研究存在潜在的方法学缺陷。没有关于螺旋CT的对照研究。

综述作者结论

目前的证据不支持用胸部X线摄影或痰细胞学检查筛查肺癌。频繁的胸部X线筛查可能有害。此外,需要方法学严谨的试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验