用于喂养早产或低出生体重婴儿的配方奶与早产母乳对比

Formula milk versus preterm human milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants.

作者信息

McGuire W, Anthony M Y

机构信息

Tayside Institute of Child Health, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK, DD1 9SY.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD002972. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002972.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm human breast milk, compared with artificial formula milk, may provide insufficient nutrition for preterm or low birth weight infants. However, human milk may confer advantages in terms of a decreased incidence of gastrointestinal and neurodevelopmental adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if formula milk compared with preterm human milk leads to improved growth and development without significant adverse effects in preterm or low birth weight infants.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and previous reviews including cross references.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing feeding with formula milk versus preterm human milk in preterm or low birth weight infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author and synthesis of data using relative risk and mean difference.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one small trial fulfilled the pre-specified inclusion criteria (Gross 1983). In preterm and low birth weight infants, enteral feeding with protein-enriched standard calorie formula milk compared with unfortified donated preterm human milk resulted in a greater rate of short term weight gain, but not of increase in length or head circumference. In the group randomised to receive formula milk, there was an increase in the risk of feed intolerance of borderline statistical significance, but no evidence of an effect on necrotising enterocolitis. There are no data on long term growth parameters or on neurodevelopmental outcomes. There are no randomised comparisons of feeding with the preterm milk of the infant's mother versus formula milk.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are very limited data from randomised trials of feeding preterm or low birth weight infants with formula milk compared with preterm human milk. This may relate to a perceived difficulty of allocating an alternative enteral feed to an infant in cases where the infant's mother wishes to feed with expressed breast milk.

摘要

背景

与人工配方奶相比,早产母乳可能无法为早产或低体重婴儿提供足够的营养。然而,母乳在降低胃肠道和神经发育不良结局发生率方面可能具有优势。

目的

确定与早产母乳相比,配方奶是否能使早产或低体重婴儿生长发育更好且无显著不良反应。

检索策略

采用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准检索策略。这包括对Cochrane对照试验注册库、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)以及先前综述(包括交叉参考文献)进行电子检索。

入选标准

比较早产或低体重婴儿喂养配方奶与早产母乳的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

采用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法提取数据,每位作者分别评估试验质量和提取数据,并使用相对风险和均值差进行数据综合分析。

主要结果

仅有一项小型试验符合预先设定的纳入标准(格罗斯,1983年)。在早产和低体重婴儿中,与未强化的捐赠早产母乳相比,用富含蛋白质的标准热量配方奶进行肠内喂养可使短期体重增加率更高,但身长或头围增加率未提高。在随机接受配方奶喂养的组中,喂养不耐受风险增加,具有临界统计学意义,但没有证据表明对坏死性小肠结肠炎有影响。没有关于长期生长参数或神经发育结局的数据。没有关于婴儿母亲的早产母乳与配方奶喂养的随机对照比较。

综述作者结论

与早产母乳相比,关于早产或低体重婴儿喂养配方奶的随机试验数据非常有限。这可能与在婴儿母亲希望用吸奶器吸出的母乳喂养的情况下,给婴儿分配替代肠内喂养存在困难有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索