Suppr超能文献

家庭医生会诊中以患者为中心程度的录像带与录音带评估比较

A comparison of videotape and audiotape assessment of patient-centredness in family physicians' consultations.

作者信息

Weingarten M A, Yaphe J, Blumenthal D, Oren M, Margalit A

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Rabin Medical Centre and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Nov;45(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00199-3.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare videotape and audiotape assessments of doctors' patient-centred behaviour in primary care consultations. The patient-centredness scale of Henbest and Stewart was used to measure the quality of 856 doctor-patient interactions in 258 consultations performed by 47 primary care physicians recorded on videotape. Assessments were performed once using only the sound track and a second time using both the sound and video-tracks. On a nominal quality scale of 0-3, the average score for all consultations was 1.94 (S.D. 0.63) by audio assessment, and 1.94 (S.D. 0.59) by video assessment (P<0.8). There was excellent agreement between audio and video scores over a wide range of scores. Little information (<5%) was lost when using audiotape compared to videotape. It was technically easier to assess the video recordings. Audio recording is equivalent to video recording for the assessment of patient-centredness using the scale of Henbest and Stewart in primary care consultations.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在初级保健会诊中对医生以患者为中心行为的录像评估和录音评估。采用亨贝斯特和斯图尔特的以患者为中心量表,对47名初级保健医生进行的258次会诊中的856次医患互动质量进行测量,这些会诊均被录像。评估分两次进行,一次仅使用音轨,另一次同时使用音轨和视频轨。在0至3的名义质量量表上,所有会诊的音频评估平均分为1.94(标准差0.63),视频评估平均分为1.94(标准差0.59)(P<0.8)。在广泛的分数范围内,音频和视频分数之间存在高度一致性。与录像带相比,使用录音带时丢失的信息很少(<5%)。评估录像记录在技术上更容易。在初级保健会诊中,使用亨贝斯特和斯图尔特量表评估以患者为中心程度时,录音与录像等效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验