Bollmann A, Binias K H, Sonne K, Grothues F, Esperer H D, Nikutta P, Klein H U
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Oct;24(10):1507-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01507.x.
The aim of this study was to determine the relation between (1) ECG fibrillatory wave amplitude and left atrial diameter and left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity using different ECG recording techniques, and (2) ECG fibrillatory frequency and frequency of LAA contractions in patients with nonrheumatic AF. In 36 patients (22 men, 14 women, mean age 61 +/- 11 years) with persistent AF, ECG recordings were performed using a standard 12-lead EGG and an orthogonal EGG lead system using a high gain, high resolution ECG. AF was classified as coarse (fibrillatory amplitude > or = 1 mm) orfine (fibrillatory amplitude < 1 mm) in leads I, aVF, V1 and corresponding leads X, Y, and Z. Fibrillatory frequency from the ECG was determined by subtracting averaged QRST complexes and applying a Fourier analysis to the resulting signal. Doppler flow was obtained from LAA during transesophageal echocardiography and LAA emptying velocity was determined. Fourier analysis was also applied to the Doppler signal generating the frequency of LAA contractions. Coarse AF was observed in 0, 9, and 18 patients in leads I, aVF, and V, respectively. It was more often (P < 0.05) detected in corresponding leads X (n = 13), Y (n = 31), and Z (n = 23). Fine AF in lead X was associated with a reduced LAA velocity (33 +/- 16 cm/s in coarse AF vs 22 +/- 13 cm/s in fine AF, P = 0.05). There was neither a relation between AF coarseness in any other ECG lead and LAA flow velocity, left atrial diameter, or echo contrast. In 25 patients with an active LAA flow, the mean frequency of LAA contractions was 6.8 +/- 0.8 Hz. The corresponding mean frequency obtainedfrom the EGG was 6.7 +/- 0.7 Hz (r = 0.85, P < 0.001). The mean difference between these two measures was 0.04 Hz, and the 95% confidence limits were 0.90 and- 0.82 Hz using the Bland-Altman method. In conclusion, AF coarseness and its relation to LAA flow velocity depend on the ECG recording technique used. LAA contractions represent one mechanical correlate of the electrical fibrillatory activity in AF.
(1)使用不同的心电图记录技术,心电图颤动波振幅与左心房直径及左心耳(LAA)流速之间的关系;(2)非风湿性房颤患者的心电图颤动频率与LAA收缩频率之间的关系。对36例持续性房颤患者(22例男性,14例女性,平均年龄61±11岁),采用标准12导联心电图及使用高增益、高分辨率心电图的正交心电图导联系统进行心电图记录。根据I、aVF、V1导联及相应的X、Y、Z导联中房颤颤动波振幅将房颤分为粗颤(颤动波振幅≥1mm)或细颤(颤动波振幅<1mm)。通过减去平均QRST复合波并对所得信号进行傅里叶分析来确定心电图的颤动频率。经食管超声心动图检查时获取LAA的多普勒血流并测定LAA排空速度。对产生LAA收缩频率的多普勒信号也进行傅里叶分析。I、aVF、V导联中分别有0、9、18例患者观察到粗颤。在相应的X导联(n = 13)、Y导联(n = 31)和Z导联(n = 23)中更常检测到粗颤(P < 0.05)。X导联中的细颤与LAA流速降低相关(粗颤时为33±16cm/s,细颤时为22±13cm/s,P = 0.05)。其他任何心电图导联中的房颤粗颤程度与LAA流速、左心房直径或超声造影之间均无关系。在25例LAA有活跃血流的患者中,LAA收缩的平均频率为6.8±0.8Hz。从心电图获得的相应平均频率为6.7±0.7Hz(r = 0.85,P < 0.001)。使用Bland - Altman方法,这两种测量方法的平均差异为0.04Hz,95%置信区间为0.90和 - 0.82Hz。总之,房颤粗颤程度及其与LAA流速的关系取决于所使用的心电图记录技术。LAA收缩代表房颤电颤动活动的一种机械关联。