Gelderblom H, Sparreboom A, de Jonge M J, Loos W J, Wilms E, Mantel M A, Hennis B, Camlett I, Verweij J, van der Burg M E
Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, AE, 3075, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer. 2001 Oct 19;85(8):1124-9. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2014.
Both weekly cisplatin chemotherapy and single agent topotecan have proven to be effective in recurrent ovarian cancer. Preclinical data show synergism between cisplatin and topotecan. Side effects for this combination are drug sequence dependent and predominantly haematologic. Since preclinical data suggest that Cremophor EL (CrEL), the formulation vehicle of paclitaxel, has a protective effect on haematological toxicity of cisplatin, CrEL was added to the combination cisplatin and topotecan. In this phase I study, escalating doses of oral topotecan administered on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 29, 30, 36, 37, 43, 44 were combined with weekly cisplatin 70 mg m(-2) d(-1) on day 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43 (scheme A) or with the presumably less myelotoxic sequence weekly cisplatin day 2, 9, 16, 30, 37, 44 (scheme B). In scheme C, CrEL 12 ml was administered prior to cisplatin in the sequence of Scheme A. 18 patients have received a total of 85 courses. In scheme A 4/10 patients, all treated with topotecan 0.45 mg m(-2) d(-1), experienced DLT: 1 patient had vomiting grade 4, 1 patient had grade 4 neutropenia >5 days, 1 patient had >2 weeks delay due to thrombocytopenia and 1 patient due to neutropenia. Both patients in scheme B (topotecan 0.45 mg m(-2) d(-1)) had DLT due to a delay > 2 weeks because of prolonged haematological toxicity. No DLT was observed in the first 3 patients in scheme C (topotecan 0.45 mg m(-2) d(-1)). However, 2 out of 3 patients treated at dose level topotecan 0.60 mg m(-2)d(-1) in scheme C experienced DLT due to >2 weeks delay because of persistent thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. We conclude that there is a modest clinical effect of CrEL on haematological toxicity for this cisplatin-based combination regimen, which seems to reduce these side effects but does not really enable an increase of the oral topotecan dose.
每周一次的顺铂化疗和单药拓扑替康已被证明对复发性卵巢癌有效。临床前数据显示顺铂和拓扑替康之间存在协同作用。该联合用药的副作用取决于药物给药顺序,且主要为血液学毒性。由于临床前数据表明紫杉醇的溶媒聚氧乙烯蓖麻油(CrEL)对顺铂的血液学毒性有保护作用,因此在顺铂与拓扑替康的联合用药中加入了CrEL。在这项I期研究中,第1、2、8、9、15、16、29、30、36、37、43、44天递增剂量口服拓扑替康,并在第1、8、15、29、36、43天联合每周一次的顺铂70mg m(-2) d(-1)(方案A),或与可能骨髓毒性较小的给药顺序即每周第2、9、16、30、37、44天使用顺铂联合(方案B)。在方案C中,按照方案A的给药顺序,在顺铂给药前给予12ml CrEL。18例患者共接受了85个疗程的治疗。在方案A中,10例患者中有4例,均接受拓扑替康0.45mg m(-2) d(-1)治疗,出现了剂量限制性毒性(DLT):1例患者出现4级呕吐,1例患者出现4级中性粒细胞减少超过5天,1例患者因血小板减少和1例患者因中性粒细胞减少导致延迟超过2周。方案B中的2例患者(拓扑替康0.45mg m(-2) d(-1))因血液学毒性延长导致延迟超过2周而出现DLT。方案C中的前3例患者(拓扑替康0.45mg m(-2) d(-1))未观察到DLT。然而,方案C中接受拓扑替康0.60mg m(-2)d(-1)剂量水平治疗的3例患者中有2例因持续性血小板减少或中性粒细胞减少导致延迟超过2周而出现DLT。我们得出结论,对于这种基于顺铂的联合治疗方案,CrEL对血液学毒性有一定的临床效果,似乎能减少这些副作用,但并不能真正增加口服拓扑替康的剂量。