Suppr超能文献

基于问题的学习变体:大型机构的过渡阶段

Problem-based learning variant: transition phase for a large institution.

作者信息

Khan I, Fareed A

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Dow Medical College, Department of Marketing Statistics, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2001 Aug;51(8):271-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare students' test scores and perceptions of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) by applying a PBL-variant.

METHOD

For the transition from LBL to PBL, PBL was varied for one discipline only and for a large group of students. Two hundred forty nine second year medical students were taught a topic of Biochemistry by the LBL method and then 141 of these were taught another topic by the PBL-variant. At the conclusion of each topic an MCQ test was given. One week later a 9 item questionnaire was given to the 50 students now attending classes to assess their perceptions of the 2 teaching formats. The test scores of the two methods were compared. Students' ratings were differentiated by the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the test scores by PBL or LBL, but PBL received significantly higher student ratings (p < 0.05) than LBL in self-study time, library time, number of books and computer consulted, enthusiasm for the topic, group discussion, depth of knowledge and interest taken in the teaching format. But there was no significant difference in students' ratings of the teacher's importance in either PBL or LBL.

CONCLUSION

PBL variant and LBL produced similar MCQ test scores but the former is more conducive to enthusiastic self-study. Thus in the transition phase, PBL may be applied to one discipline and a large group of students without undermining its merits.

摘要

目的

通过应用一种基于问题的学习(PBL)变体,比较学生在基于问题的学习和基于讲座的学习(LBL)中的考试成绩及对这两种学习方式的看法。

方法

为了从基于讲座的学习过渡到基于问题的学习,仅对一门学科的一大群学生采用了基于问题的学习变体。249名二年级医学生先通过基于讲座的学习方法学习生物化学的一个主题,然后其中141名学生通过基于问题的学习变体学习另一个主题。在每个主题结束时进行多项选择题测试。一周后,对当时正在上课的50名学生发放一份包含9个条目的问卷,以评估他们对这两种教学形式的看法。比较两种方法的考试成绩。学生的评分通过威尔科克森符号秩检验进行区分。

结果

基于问题的学习和基于讲座的学习在考试成绩上没有显著差异,但在自学时间、图书馆学习时间、查阅书籍和使用电脑的数量、对主题的热情、小组讨论、知识深度以及对教学形式的兴趣方面,基于问题的学习获得的学生评分显著高于基于讲座的学习(p < 0.05)。但在基于问题的学习和基于讲座的学习中,学生对教师重要性的评分没有显著差异。

结论

基于问题的学习变体和基于讲座的学习产生了相似的多项选择题测试成绩,但前者更有利于激发自主学习热情。因此,在过渡阶段,可以将基于问题的学习应用于一门学科的一大群学生,而不影响其优点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验