Gaffan D
Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
Behav Brain Res. 2001 Dec 14;127(1-2):5-11. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00360-6.
J.A. Horel's critique of what he termed "the hippocampal memory hypothesis" turns out, 23 years later, to have been remarkably discerning and prophetic. There is now an overwhelming weight of evidence to confirm his four key proposals: that selective destruction of the hippocampus or fornix does not produce dense global amnesia; that the effects of hippocampal or fornix lesions are not primarily a memory impairment, but an impairment in processing spatial information; that damage to the anterior temporal stem is part of the explanation of dense temporal lobe amnesia; and that the interaction of temporal cortex with prefrontal cortex is essential in memory. This review summarizes the modern evidence that reinforces each of these four proposals. A final section argues that, not only in the case of the hippocampus but also in the case of other temporal and frontal cortical areas that are involved in normal memory, the concept of a "memory system" is harmful.
23年后证明,J.A. 霍雷尔对他所谓的“海马体记忆假说”的批评极具洞察力和前瞻性。现在有大量证据证实了他的四个关键提议:选择性破坏海马体或穹窿不会导致严重的全面性失忆;海马体或穹窿损伤的影响主要不是记忆障碍,而是空间信息处理障碍;颞叶前干损伤是严重颞叶失忆症的部分原因;颞叶皮质与前额叶皮质的相互作用对记忆至关重要。本综述总结了支持这四个提议的现代证据。最后一部分指出,不仅在海马体的情况下,而且在其他参与正常记忆的颞叶和额叶皮质区域的情况下,“记忆系统”的概念都是有害的。