Seaver M, Crookston J C, Roselle D C, Wagner S J
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA.
Transfusion. 2001 Nov;41(11):1351-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41111351.x.
Many methods have been tested for the detection of bacterial contamination in platelets. However, only those using molecular biology or cell culturing consistently detect contamination at levels below 10(5) bacteria per mL. This report describes the initial investigation into an alternative method that offers the possibilities of high sensitivity and rapid response while using available laboratory equipment and supplies. This method relies on a fluorescent nucleic acid stain, which preferentially stains bacteria but not platelets, and automated epifluorescence microscopy for rapid analysis. Measurements in WBC-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs) contaminated with bacteria are reported at concentrations between 10(3) and 10(6) bacteria per mL.
Staphylococcus epidermidis or Escherichia coli was inoculated into aliquots of WBC-reduced PCs on Days 2 through 5 of storage. Bacterially inoculated and control PCs were stained, platelets and residual WBCs were lysed, and 200 microL of sample was filtered onto black polycarbonate filters. All preparations were done in triplicate. An automated epifluorescence microscope examined approximately 2 percent of the area of each filter and used image analysis to select the fluorescent particles that should be counted as bacteria.
Samples containing 3 to 5 x 10(3) bacteria per mL produced about three times as many fluorescent particles classified as bacteria as the controls. Lower concentrations of S. epidermidis were detected because of higher fluorescence intensity. Simultaneous preparation of six samples requires about 35 minutes. Analysis of each prepared sample takes 10 minutes, for a total preparation and analysis time of about 95 minutes for 6 samples.
Low concentrations (<5 x 10(3) bacteria/mL) of deliberately inoculated S. epidermidis or E. coli can be measured quickly in WBC-depleted PCs by using a fluorescent nucleic acid stain, differential lysis, and automated microscopy. Continued refinement of the method, studies employing other bacterial strains, and further validations of assay performance are warranted.
已对多种检测血小板中细菌污染的方法进行了测试。然而,只有那些使用分子生物学或细胞培养的方法能够始终检测到每毫升低于10⁵个细菌水平的污染。本报告描述了对一种替代方法的初步研究,该方法在使用现有实验室设备和耗材的情况下,具有高灵敏度和快速响应的可能性。此方法依赖于一种荧光核酸染料,该染料优先对细菌而非血小板进行染色,并利用自动落射荧光显微镜进行快速分析。报告了对每毫升含有10³至10⁶个细菌的白细胞去除血小板浓缩液(PCs)的测量结果。
在储存的第2至5天将表皮葡萄球菌或大肠杆菌接种到白细胞去除的PCs等分试样中。对接种细菌的PCs和对照PCs进行染色,使血小板和残留白细胞裂解,然后将200微升样品过滤到黑色聚碳酸酯滤膜上。所有制备均重复三次。一台自动落射荧光显微镜检查每个滤膜约2%的面积,并使用图像分析来选择应计为细菌的荧光颗粒。
每毫升含有3至5×10³个细菌的样品产生的被分类为细菌的荧光颗粒数量约为对照的三倍。由于荧光强度较高,检测到了较低浓度的表皮葡萄球菌。同时制备六个样品大约需要35分钟。对每个制备好的样品进行分析需要10分钟,六个样品的总制备和分析时间约为95分钟。
通过使用荧光核酸染料、差异裂解和自动显微镜,可以在白细胞去除的PCs中快速测量故意接种的低浓度(<5×10³个细菌/毫升)表皮葡萄球菌或大肠杆菌。该方法需要持续改进,开展使用其他细菌菌株的研究,并进一步验证检测性能。