Zhao R, Collins E J
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599, USA.
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2001;49(4):271-7.
Interest in class I MHC-mediated immunotherapy is growing rapidly. In order to fight a virus or cancer effectively, a successful immunotherapeutic must activate a large number of specific CD8+ T cells and also generate immunological memory. Attempts to generate immune responses towards tumor- or virus-derived peptides have frequently been frustrated by the nature of the peptide antigen itself. Either the peptide does not bind well to its cognate MHC, or the T cells directed towards it have been functionally inactivated in vivo. Altered-peptide ligands (APL) are an effective way to circumvent these problems. However, generating enhanced binding of altered peptides to class I MHC while still maintaining recognition of the wild-type peptide is not straightforward. Many groups design enhanced binding peptides by substituting the observed anchor residues with those that are most preferred by the class I MHC molecule. For many antigenic peptides, this approach does not work. Furthermore, if a higher affinity peptide is designed, the substitutions may result in reduced recognition by CD8+ T cells. Therefore, the design of APL requires careful testing of each candidate therapeutic in terms of affinity for class I MHC and immunological reactivity. Lastly, immunotherapy using class I MHC must also take into account the large genetic heterogeneity in the population. A therapeutic that is only effective for 5-10% of the population is not as attractive as one that works for over 90% of the population. The use of MHC supertypes (groups of class I MHC allotypes that share similar peptide-binding characteristics) shows great promise in overcoming this problem.
对I类主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)介导的免疫疗法的兴趣正在迅速增长。为了有效地对抗病毒或癌症,一种成功的免疫疗法必须激活大量特异性CD8 + T细胞,并产生免疫记忆。针对肿瘤或病毒衍生肽产生免疫反应的尝试常常因肽抗原本身的性质而受挫。要么该肽与同源MHC结合不佳,要么针对它的T细胞在体内已被功能性灭活。改变肽配体(APL)是规避这些问题的有效方法。然而,在仍然保持对野生型肽的识别的同时,使改变的肽与I类MHC的结合增强并非易事。许多研究小组通过用I类MHC分子最偏好的残基替代观察到的锚定残基来设计增强结合肽。对于许多抗原肽而言,这种方法并不奏效。此外,如果设计出具有更高亲和力的肽,这些替代可能会导致CD8 + T细胞的识别减少。因此,APL的设计需要根据其对I类MHC的亲和力和免疫反应性对每个候选疗法进行仔细测试。最后,使用I类MHC的免疫疗法还必须考虑人群中巨大的遗传异质性。一种仅对5-10%的人群有效的疗法不如一种对90%以上的人群有效的疗法有吸引力。使用MHC超型(具有相似肽结合特征的I类MHC同种异型组)在克服这个问题方面显示出巨大的前景。