Levitt M A
Department of Emergency Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center-Highland Campus, Oakland, California, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;21(4):363-9. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00385-7.
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation has been found to be efficacious in the setting of acute respiratory failure, specifically in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Its use in congestive heart failure (CHF) is less well established. Additionally, it has been reported that there is an increase in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rate with the use of bilevel positive pressure ventilation (BiPAP) in CHF patients. This study examined whether BiPAP decreases the intubation rate or improves cardiopulmonary parameters in severe CHF patients compared to high flow O(2) by mask (MASK), and whether there is an increase in AMI rate with the use of BiPAP. A prospective, randomized clinical trial at a county hospital teaching Emergency Department was conducted by enrolling 38 patients who were in severe CHF. Patients were randomized to receive either BiPAP or MASK in addition to adjunct therapy. Age and gender were not different between the groups. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry all showed no significant difference in change over time between groups, but there was a significant change over time within groups. Arterial pH, pCO(2), and pO(2) also showed no significant difference in change over time between groups, but there was a significant change over time within groups. The intubation rate for BiPAP was 23.8% (5) vs. MASK at 41.2% (7). The AMI rate was 19% (4) in the BiPAP group and 29.4% (5) in the MASK group. No true differences were detected between groups for increased oxygenation or a reduction in intubation rate. An increase in AMI rate with BiPAP was not found in this study as previously reported. This study provides support for a larger clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of BiPAP in acute CHF.
无创正压通气已被发现在急性呼吸衰竭的情况下有效,特别是在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期。其在充血性心力衰竭(CHF)中的应用尚未得到充分证实。此外,有报道称,CHF患者使用双水平正压通气(BiPAP)会使急性心肌梗死(AMI)发生率增加。本研究旨在探讨与面罩高流量吸氧(MASK)相比,BiPAP是否能降低重度CHF患者的插管率或改善心肺参数,以及使用BiPAP是否会增加AMI发生率。在一家县医院教学急诊科进行了一项前瞻性、随机临床试验,纳入了38例重度CHF患者。除辅助治疗外,患者被随机分为接受BiPAP或MASK治疗组。两组间年龄和性别无差异。心率、收缩压、舒张压、呼吸频率和脉搏血氧饱和度在两组间随时间的变化均无显著差异,但组内随时间有显著变化。动脉血pH值、pCO₂和pO₂在两组间随时间的变化也无显著差异,但组内随时间有显著变化。BiPAP组的插管率为23.8%(5例),而MASK组为41.2%(7例)。BiPAP组的AMI发生率为19%(4例),MASK组为29.4%(5例)。两组在改善氧合或降低插管率方面未发现真正差异。本研究未发现如先前报道的使用BiPAP会增加AMI发生率。本研究为评估BiPAP在急性CHF中的安全性和有效性的更大规模临床试验提供了支持。