Suppr超能文献

口服或雾化吸入地塞米松治疗轻度喉炎患儿的疗效

Effectiveness of oral or nebulized dexamethasone for children with mild croup.

作者信息

Luria J W, Gonzalez-del-Rey J A, DiGiulio G A, McAneney C M, Olson J J, Ruddy R M

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave OSB-4, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Dec;155(12):1340-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.12.1340.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of oral dexamethasone or nebulized dexamethasone sodium phosphate in children with mild croup.

METHODS

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 264 children between 6 months and 6 years of age with symptoms of croup for fewer than 48 hours. Patients were excluded if they received racemic epinephrine or corticosteroid treatment. Other exclusion criteria included corticosteroid treatment during the 14 days prior to enrollment or complicating medical condition. Subjects randomly received oral dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg), nebulized dexamethasone sodium phosphate (160 microg), or placebo. Telephone follow-up was obtained on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, defined as receiving corticosteroid or racemic epinephrine treatment during the 7 days after enrollment in the study. Secondary outcome measures included seeking additional care and the parental assessments of the patients' condition obtained during follow-up (worse, same, better, or gone).

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients received oral dexamethasone, 91 received nebulized dexamethasone, and 88 received placebo. There were 3 treatment failures in the oral dexamethasone-treated group, 12 in the nebulized dexamethasone-treated group, and 10 in the placebo-treated group (P =.05). Ten children in the oral dexamethasone-treated group sought additional care compared with 27 and 29 in the nebulized dexamethasone-treated and placebo-treated groups, respectively (P =.002). Parents of children in the oral dexamethasone-treated group reported greater improvement on day 1 (P<.001) compared with the nebulized dexamethasone-treated and placebo-treated groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with mild croup who receive oral dexamethasone treatment are less likely to seek subsequent medical care and demonstrate more rapid symptom resolution compared with children who receive nebulized dexamethasone or placebo treatment.

摘要

目的

评估口服地塞米松或雾化吸入地塞米松磷酸钠治疗轻度喉炎患儿的疗效。

方法

对264名6个月至6岁、喉炎症状持续时间少于48小时的患儿进行双盲、安慰剂对照研究。若患儿接受过消旋肾上腺素或皮质类固醇治疗,则将其排除。其他排除标准包括入组前14天内接受过皮质类固醇治疗或存在复杂的医疗状况。受试者随机接受口服地塞米松(0.6毫克/千克)、雾化吸入地塞米松磷酸钠(160微克)或安慰剂治疗。在第1、2、3、4和7天进行电话随访。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标为治疗失败,定义为在研究入组后7天内接受皮质类固醇或消旋肾上腺素治疗。次要观察指标包括寻求额外治疗以及随访期间家长对患儿病情的评估(更差、相同、更好或痊愈)。

结果

85名患儿接受口服地塞米松治疗,91名接受雾化吸入地塞米松治疗,88名接受安慰剂治疗。口服地塞米松治疗组有3例治疗失败,雾化吸入地塞米松治疗组有12例,安慰剂治疗组有10例(P = 0.05)。口服地塞米松治疗组有10名患儿寻求额外治疗,而雾化吸入地塞米松治疗组和安慰剂治疗组分别有27名和29名患儿寻求额外治疗(P = 0.002)。与雾化吸入地塞米松治疗组和安慰剂治疗组相比,口服地塞米松治疗组患儿的家长在第1天报告症状改善更明显(P<0.001)。

结论

与接受雾化吸入地塞米松或安慰剂治疗的患儿相比,接受口服地塞米松治疗的轻度喉炎患儿寻求后续医疗护理的可能性较小,且症状缓解更快。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验