van Overbeek Leo S, Cassidy Mike, Kozdroj Jacek, Trevors Jack T, van Elsas Jan D
Plant Research International, P.O. Box 16, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Microbiol Methods. 2002 Jan;48(1):69-86. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00347-5.
Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2, the causative agent of brown rot in potato, has been responsible for large crop losses in Northwest Europe during the last decade. Knowledge on the ecological behaviour of R. solanacearum and its antagonists is required to develop sound procedures for its control and eradication in infested fields.A polyphasic approach was used to study the invasion of plants by a selected R. solanacearum biovar 2 strain, denoted 1609, either or not in combination with the antagonistic strains Pseudomonas corrugata IDV1 and P. fluorescens UA5-40. Thus, this study combined plating (spread and drop plate methods), reporter gene technology (gfp mutants) and serological (imunofluorescence colony staining [IFC]) and molecular techniques (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH], PCR with R. solanacearum specific primers and PCR-DGGE on plant DNA extracts). The behaviour of R. solanacearum 1609 and the two control strains was studied in bulk and (tomato) rhizosphere soil and the rhizoplane and stems of tomato plants. The results showed that an interaction between the pathogen and the control strains at the root surface was likely. In particular, R. solanacearum 1609 CFU numbers were significantly reduced on tomato roots treated with P. corrugata IDV1(chr:gfp1) cells as compared to those on untreated roots. Concomitant with the presence of P. corrugata IDV1(chr:gfp1), plant invasion by the pathogen was hampered, but not abolished.PCR-DGGE analyses of the tomato rhizoplane supported the evidence for antagonistic activity against the pathogen; as only weak R. solanacearum 1609 specific bands were detected in profiles derived from mixed systems versus strong bands in profiles from systems containing only the pathogen. Using FISH, a difference in root colonization was demonstrated between the pathogen and one of the two antagonists, i.e. P. corrugata IDV1(chr:gfp1); R. solanacearum strain 1609 was clearly detected in the vascular cylinder of tomato plants, whereas strain IDV1 was absent.R. solanacearum 1609 cells were also detected in stems of plants that had developed in soils treated with this strain, even in cases in which disease symptoms were absent, indicating the occurrence of symptomless infection. In contrast, strain 1609 cells were not found in stems of several plants treated with either one of the two antagonists. The polyphasic analysis is valuable for testing antagonistic strains for approval as biocontrol agents in agricultural practice.
青枯雷尔氏菌生物变种2是马铃薯褐腐病的病原体,在过去十年中,它给欧洲西北部地区造成了巨大的作物损失。为了制定在受侵染田地中控制和根除该病菌的有效程序,需要了解青枯雷尔氏菌及其拮抗物的生态行为。采用多相方法研究了一株选定的青枯雷尔氏菌生物变种2菌株(编号1609)对植物的侵染情况,该菌株单独或与拮抗菌株皱褶假单胞菌IDV1和荧光假单胞菌UA5 - 40联合使用。因此,本研究结合了平板接种(涂布和平板点滴法)、报告基因技术(绿色荧光蛋白突变体)、血清学(免疫荧光菌落染色[IFC])和分子技术(荧光原位杂交[FISH]、使用青枯雷尔氏菌特异性引物的PCR以及对植物DNA提取物进行的PCR - DGGE)。在大量土壤和(番茄)根际土壤以及番茄植株的根际和茎中研究了青枯雷尔氏菌1609和两种对照菌株的行为。结果表明,病原体与对照菌株在根表面可能存在相互作用。特别是,与未处理的根相比,用皱褶假单胞菌IDV1(chr:gfp1)细胞处理的番茄根上,青枯雷尔氏菌1609的菌落形成单位数量显著减少。伴随着皱褶假单胞菌IDV1(chr:gfp1)的存在,可以阻碍但不能消除病原体对植物的侵染。对番茄根际的PCR - DGGE分析支持了对病原体具有拮抗活性的证据;因为在混合系统的图谱中仅检测到微弱的青枯雷尔氏菌1609特异性条带,而在仅含病原体的系统图谱中条带较强。使用FISH技术,证明了病原体与两种拮抗物之一(即皱褶假单胞菌IDV1(chr:gfp1))在根定殖方面存在差异;在番茄植株的维管束中清晰地检测到青枯雷尔氏菌菌株1609,而IDV1菌株不存在。在经该菌株处理的土壤中生长的植物茎中也检测到了青枯雷尔氏菌1609细胞,即使在没有病害症状的情况下也是如此,这表明存在无症状感染。相比之下,在经两种拮抗物之一处理的几株植物的茎中未发现1609菌株细胞。这种多相分析对于测试拮抗菌株是否可作为农业实践中的生物防治剂具有重要价值。