Mallol J, Aguirre V, Rhem R, Rodriguez J, Dolovich M
University of Santiago de Chile, Hospital El Pino, Santiago, Chile.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2001 Dec;32(6):447-52. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1157.
Many pharmaceutical companies sell salbutamol in metered-dose inhalers (MDI) for the treatment of asthma. However, the therapeutic equivalence of the more recently released generic products has not been compared with the original patented product in children. Twenty children with mild to moderate asthma, presently asymptomatic and with normal lung function, were randomly allocated to receive 200 microg of inhaled salbutamol (Albuterol) from three MDIs prepared by different manufacturers: the original Glaxo product and two generic products. The three drug formulations and placebo were given 10 min before a methacholine challenge test to determine the degree of protection provided against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction (MIB) by each salbutamol aerosol. Tests were performed on 4 consecutive days. Doubling concentrations of methacholine were inhaled until the forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) decreased by 20% from its baseline value. Compared to placebo, all patients increased significantly the provocation concentration that decreased FEV(1) by 20% (PC(20)) by more than one doubling concentration after inhaling each of the three salbutamol aerosols. The effectiveness was not significantly different between medications (P = 0.8). There was a small but significant difference among MDIs in aerosol particle size and total and fine-particle dose released per actuation. However, no relation was found between aerosol particle size or released dose and the protective effect. This study shows that the three tested brands of salbutamol MDI protected asthmatic children equally from MIB. When prescribing these salbutamol MDIs to prevent symptoms triggered by nonspecific stimuli in asthmatic children, the selection may be based on cost-benefit criteria.
许多制药公司都销售用于治疗哮喘的沙丁胺醇定量吸入器(MDI)。然而,最近推出的仿制药产品与原专利产品在儿童中的治疗等效性尚未得到比较。20名轻度至中度哮喘患儿,目前无症状且肺功能正常,被随机分配接受来自不同制造商制备的三种MDI吸入的200微克沙丁胺醇(沙丁胺醇):葛兰素原研产品和两种仿制药产品。在进行乙酰甲胆碱激发试验前10分钟给予这三种药物制剂和安慰剂,以确定每种沙丁胺醇气雾剂对乙酰甲胆碱诱导的支气管收缩(MIB)的保护程度。连续4天进行测试。吸入浓度加倍的乙酰甲胆碱,直到1秒用力呼气量(FEV(1))从基线值下降20%。与安慰剂相比,吸入三种沙丁胺醇气雾剂中的每一种后,所有患者使FEV(1)下降20%的激发浓度(PC(20))显著增加超过一个浓度加倍。药物之间的有效性无显著差异(P = 0.8)。MDI之间在气雾剂颗粒大小以及每次按压释放的总颗粒剂量和细颗粒剂量方面存在微小但显著的差异。然而,未发现气雾剂颗粒大小或释放剂量与保护作用之间存在关联。本研究表明,三种测试品牌的沙丁胺醇MDI对哮喘儿童预防MIB的保护作用相同。在为哮喘儿童开这些沙丁胺醇MDI以预防非特异性刺激引发的症状时,选择可基于成本效益标准。