Lima L G F, Prado A P, Perri S H V
Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde Animal, Curso de Medicina Veterinária, UNESP, Rua Clóvis Pestana 793, CEP 16-050-680, Araçatuba, SP Brazil.
Vet Parasitol. 2002 Jan 28;103(3):227-35. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00588-x.
Visual estimates are generally used for counts of horn flies, Haematobia irritans (L.) and play an important role as an instrument to quantify fly populations in scientific studies. In this study, horn fly counts were performed on 30 Nelore steers in the municipality of Araçatuba, SP Brazil, from January to December 1998. Flies were counted weekly by two methods: the estimate method whereby estimates of the number of flies on one side of the animal are obtained by visual observation, and the filming method whereby images of flies from both sides of the animal are recorded with a video camera. The tape was then played on a videotape recorder coupled to a television and the flies were counted on the screen. Both methods showed variations in horn fly population density during the period studied. However, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the two methods with the filming method permitting the visualization of a larger number of flies than the estimate method. In addition, the filming method permitted safe and reliable counts hours after the images were taken, with the advantage that the tape can serve as an archive for random re-counts.
视觉估计通常用于统计角蝇(血蝇属,Haematobia irritans (L.))的数量,并且在科学研究中作为量化蝇类种群的一种手段发挥着重要作用。在本研究中,于1998年1月至12月期间,在巴西圣保罗州阿拉萨图巴市对30头内罗尔阉牛进行了角蝇数量统计。每周通过两种方法统计苍蝇数量:估计法,即通过视觉观察获得动物一侧苍蝇数量的估计值;拍摄法,即使用摄像机记录动物两侧苍蝇的图像。然后将录像带在与电视相连的录像机上播放,并在屏幕上统计苍蝇数量。在所研究的时间段内,两种方法对角蝇种群密度均显示出变化。然而,两种方法之间观察到显著差异(p < 0.05),拍摄法比估计法能观察到更多的苍蝇。此外,拍摄法在拍摄图像数小时后仍能进行安全可靠的计数,其优点是录像带可作为存档用于随机重新计数。