Suppr超能文献

风险调整的需求侧视角。

A demand-side view of risk adjustment.

作者信息

Feldman R, Dowd B E, Maciejewski M

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):280-9. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.280.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the efficient allocation of consumers to health plans. Specifically, we address the question of why employers that offer multiple health plans often make larger contributions to the premiums of the high-cost plans. Our perspective is that the subsidy for high-cost plans represents a form of demand-side risk adjustment that improves efficiency. Without such subsidies (and in the absence of formal risk adjustment), too few employees would choose the high-cost plans preferred by high-risk workers. We test the theory by estimating a model of the employer premium subsidy, using data from a survey of large public employers in 1994. Our empirical analysis shows that employers are more likely to subsidize high-cost plans when the benefits of risk adjustment are greater. The findings suggest that the premium subsidy can accomplish some of the benefits of formal risk adjustment.

摘要

本文分析了消费者在健康保险计划中的有效分配情况。具体而言,我们探讨了为何提供多种健康保险计划的雇主通常会为高成本计划的保费提供更高的补贴。我们的观点是,对高成本计划的补贴代表了一种需求侧风险调整形式,可提高效率。如果没有此类补贴(且不存在正式的风险调整),选择高风险员工偏好的高成本计划的员工就会过少。我们利用1994年对大型公共雇主的一项调查数据,通过估计雇主保费补贴模型来检验这一理论。我们的实证分析表明,当风险调整的益处更大时,雇主更有可能补贴高成本计划。研究结果表明,保费补贴可以实现正式风险调整的一些益处。

相似文献

1
A demand-side view of risk adjustment.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):280-9. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.280.
3
Private employers don't need formal risk adjustment.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):260-9. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.260.
4
Health plans and selection: formal risk adjustment vs. market design and contracts.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):290-8. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.290.
5
How does the employer contribution for the federal employees health benefits program influence plan selection?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):211-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.211.
6
Formal risk adjustment by private employers.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):299-309. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.299.
7
Individual-based risk adjustment by health insurers: needs, options, and methods.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):310-4. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.310.
8
Why don't private employers use risk adjustment? Conference overview.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):242-4. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.242.
9
Employer contribution methods and health insurance premiums: does managed competition work?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Jun;1(2):159-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1012878628161.
10
The prevalence of formal risk adjustment in health plan purchasing.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):245-59. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.245.

引用本文的文献

1
Employer contribution methods and health insurance premiums: does managed competition work?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Jun;1(2):159-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1012878628161.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验