Feldman R, Dowd B E, Maciejewski M
Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):280-9. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.280.
This paper analyzes the efficient allocation of consumers to health plans. Specifically, we address the question of why employers that offer multiple health plans often make larger contributions to the premiums of the high-cost plans. Our perspective is that the subsidy for high-cost plans represents a form of demand-side risk adjustment that improves efficiency. Without such subsidies (and in the absence of formal risk adjustment), too few employees would choose the high-cost plans preferred by high-risk workers. We test the theory by estimating a model of the employer premium subsidy, using data from a survey of large public employers in 1994. Our empirical analysis shows that employers are more likely to subsidize high-cost plans when the benefits of risk adjustment are greater. The findings suggest that the premium subsidy can accomplish some of the benefits of formal risk adjustment.
本文分析了消费者在健康保险计划中的有效分配情况。具体而言,我们探讨了为何提供多种健康保险计划的雇主通常会为高成本计划的保费提供更高的补贴。我们的观点是,对高成本计划的补贴代表了一种需求侧风险调整形式,可提高效率。如果没有此类补贴(且不存在正式的风险调整),选择高风险员工偏好的高成本计划的员工就会过少。我们利用1994年对大型公共雇主的一项调查数据,通过估计雇主保费补贴模型来检验这一理论。我们的实证分析表明,当风险调整的益处更大时,雇主更有可能补贴高成本计划。研究结果表明,保费补贴可以实现正式风险调整的一些益处。