Möllmann H, Wagner M, Krishnaswami S, Dimova H, Tang Y, Falcoz C, Daley-Yates P T, Krieg M, Stöckmann R, Barth J, Lawlor C, Möllmann A C, Derendorf H, Hochhaus G
Medical Clinic Bergmannsheil, University of Bochum, Germany.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Dec;41(12):1329-38. doi: 10.1177/00912700122012913.
Direct comparisons of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of inhaled corticosteroids after single and multiple dosing in the same subjects are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare thePK/PDproperties of clinically equivalent, single, and multiple doses of dry-powder formulations of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP 200 and 500 microg via Diskus) and budesonide (BUD, 400 and 1,000 microg via Turbohaler). Fourteen healthy subjects completed a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study consisting of a single dose administered at 8 a.m. on day 1 followed by 4 days of twice-daily dosing at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. on days 2 to 5. Serum concentrations of FP and BUD were measured using validated liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry assays. The 24-hour cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) in serum was monitored as the pharmacodynamic surrogate marker. Peak serum concentrations following single and multiple dosing were observed 10 to 30 minutes after inhalation for BUD and 30 to 90 minutes afterinhalation of FP with no influence of dose ordosingregimen. After a single dose of 1000 microg BUD and 500 microg FP the median estimates of terminal half-life and mean residence time were 3.5 and 3.9 hours for BUD and 10.1 and 12.0 hours for FP, respectively. Using previously reported intravenous data, the mean absorption times (MAT) were calculated to be around 2 hours and 7 hours for BUD and FP respectively. On average, the area under the curve (A UC) at steady state (day 5) was up to 30% higher for BUD compared to that over a 12-hour period following the first dose on day 1, whereas A UC estimates were 50% to 80% higherforFP at steady state, indicating accumulation. However, the steady-state Cmax values were seven to eight times and AUC values three to four times higher for BUD than for FP. Comparison of active treatment data with placebo showed that CCS after a single dose was not pronounced for any of the doses/drugs studied. On day 5, both doses of BUD caused statistically significant suppression (CCS of 19% for the 400 microg dose and 36% for the 1,000 microg dose). For FP only the high dose had a statistically significant effect on serum cortisol (CCS of 14% for the 200 microg dose and 27% for the 500 microg dose). Compared to BUD, FP has slower pulmonary absorption and slower elimination kinetics. However, following inhalation of therapeutically equipotent, multiple twice-daily doses in healthy subjects, the systemic effects of FP delivered via Diskus on AUC24 serum cortisol were relatively low and similar to those of BUD delivered via Turbohaler.
在同一受试者中对吸入性糖皮质激素单剂量和多剂量给药后的药代动力学(PK)和全身药效学(PD)特性进行直接比较的研究很少。本研究的目的是比较临床等效的单剂量和多剂量吸入丙酸氟替卡松(通过都保吸入200和500微克)和布地奈德(通过准纳器吸入400和1000微克)干粉制剂的PK/PD特性。14名健康受试者完成了一项双盲、双模拟、随机、安慰剂对照、五交叉研究,包括在第1天上午8点给予单剂量,随后在第2至5天上午8点和晚上8点每日两次给药,共4天。使用经过验证的液相色谱/质谱分析法测量血清中氟替卡松和布地奈德的浓度。监测血清中24小时累积皮质醇抑制(CCS)作为药效学替代指标。布地奈德吸入后10至30分钟观察到单剂量和多剂量给药后的血清峰值浓度,氟替卡松吸入后30至90分钟观察到血清峰值浓度,不受剂量或给药方案的影响。单次给予1000微克布地奈德和500微克氟替卡松后,布地奈德的终末半衰期和平均驻留时间的中位数估计值分别为3.5小时和3.9小时,氟替卡松分别为10.1小时和10小时和12.0小时。根据先前报道的静脉给药数据,计算出布地奈德和氟替卡松的平均吸收时间(MAT)分别约为 2小时和7小时。平均而言,布地奈德在稳态(第5天)时的曲线下面积(AUC)比第1天首次给药后12小时期间的AUC高30%,而氟替卡松在稳态时的AUC估计值高50%至80%,表明有蓄积。然而,布地奈德的稳态Cmax值比氟替卡松高7至8倍,AUC值高3至4倍。将活性治疗数据与安慰剂进行比较表明,在所研究的任何剂量/药物中,单剂量给药后的CCS均不明显。在第5天,两种剂量的布地奈德均引起统计学上显著的抑制(400微克剂量的CCS为19%,1000微克剂量的CCS为36%)。对于氟替卡松,只有高剂量对血清皮质醇有统计学上显著的影响(200微克剂量的CCS为14%,500微克剂量的CCS为27%)。与布地奈德相比,氟替卡松的肺部吸收较慢,消除动力学也较慢。然而,在健康受试者中吸入治疗等效的每日两次多剂量后,通过都保递送的氟替卡松对AUC24血清皮质醇的全身作用相对较低,与通过准纳器递送的布地奈德相似。