Suppr超能文献

对于阅读障碍儿童,快速自动命名缺陷和语音意识缺陷会叠加吗?

Are RAN- and phonological awareness-deficits additive in children with reading disabilities?

作者信息

Compton D L, DeFries J C, Olson R K

机构信息

Department of Special Education, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5701, USA.

出版信息

Dyslexia. 2001 Jul-Sep;7(3):125-49. doi: 10.1002/dys.198.

Abstract

The double-deficit hypothesis (Wolf, M. and Bowers, P.G. (1999) The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438) proposes that deficits in phonological processing and rapid automatized naming (RAN) are separable sources of reading dysfunction. Further, the double-deficit hypothesis predicts that the presence of deficits in both phonological processing and RAN have an additive negative influence on reading performance above and beyond that of a single deficit. The purpose of this study was to examine the additive nature of phonological awareness (PA)- and RAN-deficits on written language skill in children with reading disabilities (RD). Concurrent relationships between PA, RAN, and written language skills were examined in 476 children with RD, ranging in age from 8 to 18 years of age. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that PA and RAN skill have an additive effect on a majority of the reading and spelling measures. When participants were classified into three deficit subtypes based on the double-deficit model (i.e. phonological-, rate-, and double-deficit), comparisons across the subtypes confirmed that individuals with double-deficits performed below the single-deficit groups on both subtyping variables (RAN and PA) and all measures of written language. When the double- and single-deficit groups were matched on the subtyping variable (i.e. double- and rate-deficit groups matched on RAN and double- and phonological-deficit groups matched on PA) differences between the double- and rate-deficit groups remained in non-word reading, whereas differences between the double- and phonological-deficit groups remained in timed word recognition and reading comprehension. These results support an additive model in which RAN-deficits primarily affect tasks that require speeded/fluent response, and PA-deficits primarily affect tasks that emphasize phonological processing skill. Results are also presented that illustrate several statistical problems associated with the formation of deficit groups by dichotomizing the RAN and PA variables.

摘要

双重缺陷假说(沃尔夫,M.和鲍尔斯,P.G.(1999年)《发育性阅读障碍的双重缺陷假说》。《教育心理学杂志》,91卷,415 - 438页)提出,语音加工缺陷和快速自动命名(RAN)缺陷是阅读功能障碍的可分离来源。此外,双重缺陷假说预测,语音加工和RAN两者都存在缺陷,会对阅读表现产生超出单一缺陷的累加负面影响。本研究的目的是检验语音意识(PA)缺陷和RAN缺陷对阅读障碍(RD)儿童书面语言技能的累加性质。对476名年龄在8至18岁的RD儿童,考察了PA、RAN和书面语言技能之间的并发关系。层次回归分析表明,PA和RAN技能对大多数阅读和拼写指标有累加效应。当根据双重缺陷模型将参与者分为三种缺陷亚型时(即语音缺陷型、速度缺陷型和双重缺陷型),各亚型之间的比较证实,双重缺陷个体在两种亚型变量(RAN和PA)以及所有书面语言指标上的表现均低于单一缺陷组。当双重缺陷组和单一缺陷组在亚型变量上匹配时(即双重缺陷组和速度缺陷组在RAN上匹配,双重缺陷组和语音缺陷组在PA上匹配),双重缺陷组和速度缺陷组在非单词阅读方面仍存在差异,而双重缺陷组和语音缺陷组在限时单词识别和阅读理解方面仍存在差异。这些结果支持了一种累加模型,其中RAN缺陷主要影响需要快速/流畅反应的任务,而PA缺陷主要影响强调语音加工技能的任务。还呈现了一些结果,说明了通过对RAN和PA变量进行二分法来形成缺陷组所涉及的几个统计问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验