Piotrowski B T, Gillette W B, Hancock E B
Dental Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Dec;132(12):1694-701; quiz 1726-7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0122.
Abfraction is believed to be caused by biomechanical loading forces. It may be due to flexure and ultimate fatigue of tooth tissues that occur away from the point of occlusal loading. Other possible causes of cervical lesions include toothbrush abrasion and erosion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and prevalence of abfraction-like lesions in a population of U.S. veterans.
The authors evaluated 103 teeth with noncarious cervical lesions in 32 subjects and characterized them based on the surface on which the lesion was located, history of toothbrush abrasion, size of the lesion, presence of plaque, surface texture, and presence and size of occlusal wear facets.
Clinical examination revealed that adjacent control teeth had a significantly lower percentage of surfaces with plaque than did teeth with cervical lesions. Control teeth also had significantly less gingival recession than did affected teeth. Seventy-five percent of subjects reported a history of using a firm toothbrush, and 78.1 percent reported using a brushing technique that is known to cause toothbrush abrasion in the affected area. Affected teeth had neither significantly different occlusal wear facets nor occlusal contacts than control teeth. No significant correlations were found between cervical lesion dimensions and facet area.
Toothbrush abrasion is strongly suspected as contributing to the formation of the majority of wedge-shaped lesions in this group of subjects. A small subset of lesions is thought to have resulted from some other phenomenon. Although the presence or contribution of occlusal stresses in the direct formation of these lesions could not be measured directly, the possibility of abfraction could not be eliminated.
Because the existence of abfraction could not be ruled out in about 15 percent of the cases, teeth with noncarious, wedge-shaped lesions warrant careful occlusal evaluation, with the possible need for occlusal adjustment or bitesplint therapy to treat bruxism.
磨损被认为是由生物力学负荷力引起的。它可能是由于牙齿组织在远离咬合负荷点处发生弯曲和最终疲劳所致。颈部病变的其他可能原因包括牙刷磨损和侵蚀。本研究的目的是调查美国退伍军人人群中类磨损病变的特征和患病率。
作者评估了32名受试者中103颗患有非龋性颈部病变的牙齿,并根据病变所在表面、牙刷磨损史、病变大小、菌斑存在情况、表面质地以及咬合磨损小平面的存在和大小对其进行特征描述。
临床检查发现,相邻的对照牙有菌斑的表面百分比明显低于有颈部病变的牙齿。对照牙的牙龈退缩也明显少于患牙。75%的受试者报告有使用硬毛牙刷的历史,78.1%的受试者报告使用的刷牙技术已知会在患区导致牙刷磨损。患牙与对照牙相比,咬合磨损小平面和咬合接触均无显著差异。颈部病变尺寸与小平面面积之间未发现显著相关性。
强烈怀疑牙刷磨损是导致该组受试者中大多数楔形病变形成的原因。一小部分病变被认为是由其他一些现象引起的。虽然这些病变直接形成过程中咬合应力的存在或作用无法直接测量,但磨损的可能性无法排除。
由于约15%的病例无法排除磨损的存在,患有非龋性楔形病变的牙齿需要仔细进行咬合评估,可能需要进行咬合调整或使用咬合板治疗磨牙症。