Suppr超能文献

哌替啶:一篇批判性综述。

Meperidine: a critical review.

作者信息

Latta Kenneth S, Ginsberg Brian, Barkin Robert L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):53-68. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200201000-00010.

Abstract

Meperidine was initially synthesized as an anticholinergic agent but was soon discovered to have analgesic properties. Although meperidine's anticholinergic effects were demonstrated in vivo, the anticholinergic effects on the biliary and renal tracts have not been demonstrated in vivo. Studies have clearly demonstrated that meperidine is no more efficacious in treating biliary or renal tract spasm than comparative mu opioids. The initial studies demonstrating the analgesic efficacy of meperidine were mostly case reports and not double-blind, randomized, controlled trials in specific populations. Subsequent comparative studies failed to demonstrate any advantages of meperidine over comparable doses of other analgesics. Meperidine was portrayed in practice and teaching as having unique clinical advantages. The analgesic effects of meperidine are not pronounced, and, in addition, meperidine use is complicated by unique side effects including serotonergic crisis and normeperidine toxicity. Meperidine's poor efficacy, toxicity, and multiple drug interactions have resulted in a movement to replace meperidine with more efficacious and less toxic opioid analgesics.

摘要

哌替啶最初是作为一种抗胆碱能药物合成的,但很快就被发现具有镇痛特性。尽管哌替啶的抗胆碱能作用在体内得到了证实,但其对胆道和泌尿道的抗胆碱能作用尚未在体内得到证实。研究清楚地表明,在治疗胆道或泌尿道痉挛方面,哌替啶并不比其他阿片类药物更有效。最初证明哌替啶镇痛效果的研究大多是病例报告,而非针对特定人群的双盲、随机、对照试验。随后的比较研究未能证明哌替啶相对于其他同等剂量镇痛药有任何优势。在实践和教学中,哌替啶被描述为具有独特的临床优势。哌替啶的镇痛效果并不显著,此外,使用哌替啶会出现包括血清素能危象和去甲哌替啶毒性在内的独特副作用。哌替啶疗效不佳、毒性大且存在多种药物相互作用,因此人们倾向于用更有效、毒性更小的阿片类镇痛药取代哌替啶。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验