Fan Q, Tay S K, Shen K
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2001 May;36(5):271-4.
To determine the effectiveness and safety of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and the significance of positive margins in cervical cone biopsy specimens with the relationship of prognosis.
LEEP under local anesthesia and colposcopic guidance was performed in an outpatient of colposcopic clinic. Records of 135 patients treated between Feb 1992 and Jul 1999 were reviewed prospectively.
The median age of patients in this study was 42 years (range 18-67 years), parity 2.2 times (range 0-8 times). High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) accounted for majority of diagnosis according to pap smear (65.9%) and colposcopy (75.6%) respectively. The results of LEEP demonstrated negative histology in 7 patients (5.2%), human papilloma virus (HPV) infection in 2 patients (1.5%), CINI in 15 patients (11.1%), HGSIL in 108 patients (80.0%) which including 20 patients (14.8%) of CINII, 88 patients (65.2%) of CINIII, microinvasion in 3 patients (2.2%). Clear resection margin of lesion in cervix was noted in 78 (57.8%) patients. Unclear margins were appeared in 57 (42.2%) patients including 21 cases (15.6%) of resection margin positive and 36 cases(26.7%) of resection margin undetermined. HGSIL accounted for the majority (54 cases, 94.7%) in this kind of patients. The residual CIN occurred in 1 patient (4.8%) with the resection margin positive and 3 patients(8.3%) with the resection margin undetermined respectively. In 2 patients (2.6%) with the resection margin clear. Recurrence CIN occurred in 1 patient (4.8%) with the resection margin positive and 2 patients (5.6%) with the resection margin undetermined respectively, none of the patients (0.0%) with the resection margin clear. The overall cure rate in this study was 93.3% after first LEEP done. The residual CIN was identified in 6 (4.4%) patients. The recurrence CIN occurred in 3 (2.2%) patients. Complications of LEEP occurred in 14.1% (19/135) patients in this study.
LEEP is a kind of effective and safe method for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The status of resection margin should be concerned. Margin involvement of specimen is the risk factor for residual and recurrence of CIN.
确定环形电切术(LEEP)治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的有效性和安全性,以及宫颈锥切活检标本切缘阳性的意义及其与预后的关系。
在阴道镜门诊对135例患者进行局部麻醉下阴道镜引导的LEEP手术。对1992年2月至1999年7月间接受治疗的患者记录进行前瞻性回顾。
本研究患者的中位年龄为42岁(范围18 - 67岁),平均产次2.2次(范围0 - 8次)。根据巴氏涂片和阴道镜检查,分别有65.9%和75.6%的诊断为高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HGSIL)。LEEP结果显示,7例(5.2%)组织学结果为阴性,2例(1.5%)人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染,15例(11.1%)为CINI,108例(80.0%)为HGSIL,其中包括20例(14.8%)CINII、88例(65.2%)CINIII,3例(2.2%)微浸润。78例(57.8%)患者宫颈病变切除切缘清晰。57例(42.2%)患者切缘不清晰,包括21例(15.6%)切缘阳性和36例(26.7%)切缘不确定。此类患者中HGSIL占多数(54例,94.7%)。切缘阳性的患者中有1例(4.8%)发生残留CIN,切缘不确定的患者中有3例(8.3%)发生残留CIN。切缘清晰的2例患者(2.6%)中,切缘阳性的患者中有1例(4.8%)发生CIN复发,切缘不确定的患者中有2例(5.6%)发生CIN复发,切缘清晰的患者均未复发(0.0%)。首次LEEP术后本研究的总体治愈率为93.3%。6例(4.4%)患者发现残留CIN。3例(2.2%)患者发生CIN复发。本研究中14.1%(19/135)的患者发生了LEEP相关并发症。
LEEP是治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的一种有效且安全的方法。应关注切除切缘情况。标本切缘受累是CIN残留和复发的危险因素。