Sato M, Ando M, Minami H, Ando Y, Ando M, Yamamoto M, Sakai S, Watanabe A, Ikeda T, Sekido Y, Saka H, Shimokata K, Hasegawa Y
First Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2001 Dec;48(6):481-7. doi: 10.1007/s002800100355.
To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan combined with carboplatin, to evaluate its efficacy and toxicity for patients with lung cancer, and to examine its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
The dose of irinotecan was escalated from 40 mg/m2 per week in increments of 10 mg/m2. Carboplatin was fixed at 300 mg/m2. Multivariate regression models with an interaction term were used to evaluate synergistic pharmacodynamic interactions.
The MTD and recommended dose of irinotecan were 60 and 50 mg/m2, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 or 4 diarrhea. In phase II studies, response rates were 81.3% (95% confidence interval 61.8-100%) in 16 patients with small-cell lung cancer and 22.2% (2.7-41.8%) in 18 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Two patients (6%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 diarrhea. The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of carboplatin ranged from 2.87 to 9.31 mg x min/ml, with a median of 4.66 mg x min/ml. In pharmacodynamic analyses, the log-transformed surviving fraction in platelet count (SFp) showed a significant association with the AUC of carboplatin (P=0.010), while that in neutrophil count (SFn) was not significantly correlated with any pharmacokinetic parameter. The interaction term was not significant in either case.
These results indicate that AUC-based dosing of carboplatin is still rational in combination chemotherapy. A more sensitive method for predicting life-threatening toxicities is needed, however, because traditional pharmacokinetic parameters were not adequate tools for identifying patients at high risk of severe neutropenia and diarrhea. This combination regimen has only modest activity, and further studies are necessary to evaluate a different dose schedule.
确定伊立替康联合卡铂的最大耐受剂量(MTD),评估其对肺癌患者的疗效和毒性,并研究其药代动力学和药效学。
伊立替康剂量从每周40mg/m²开始,以10mg/m²的增量递增。卡铂固定为300mg/m²。使用带有交互项的多变量回归模型评估协同药效学相互作用。
伊立替康的MTD和推荐剂量分别为60mg/m²和50mg/m²。剂量限制性毒性为4级中性粒细胞减少和3级或4级腹泻。在II期研究中,16例小细胞肺癌患者的缓解率为81.3%(95%置信区间61.8 - 100%),18例非小细胞肺癌患者的缓解率为22.2%(2.7 - 41.8%)。2例患者(6%)出现4级中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少和3级腹泻。卡铂的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)范围为2.87至9.31mg·min/ml,中位数为4.66mg·min/ml。在药效学分析中,血小板计数的对数转换存活分数(SFp)与卡铂的AUC显著相关(P = 0.010),而中性粒细胞计数的对数转换存活分数(SFn)与任何药代动力学参数均无显著相关性。在两种情况下交互项均不显著。
这些结果表明,在联合化疗中基于AUC给药卡铂仍然是合理的。然而,需要一种更敏感的方法来预测危及生命的毒性,因为传统药代动力学参数不是识别严重中性粒细胞减少和腹泻高风险患者的充分工具。这种联合方案的活性有限,需要进一步研究来评估不同的剂量方案。