McMahon Lance R, Gerak Lisa R, Carter Lawrence, Ma Chunrong, Cook James M, France Charles P
Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 78229-3900, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Feb;300(2):505-12. doi: 10.1124/jpet.300.2.505.
Drug discrimination was used to examine the effects of benzodiazepine (BZ)(1) receptor-selective ligands in rhesus monkeys. In diazepam-treated (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.) monkeys discriminating the nonselective BZ antagonist flumazenil (0.32 mg/kg, s.c.), the BZ(1)-selective antagonist beta-carboline-3-carboxylate-t-butyl ester (beta-CCt) substituted for flumazenil. The onset of action of beta-CCt was delayed with a dose of 5.6 mg/kg beta-CCt substituting for flumazenil 2 h after injection. In monkeys discriminating the nonselective BZ agonist midazolam (0.56 mg/kg, s.c.), the BZ(1)-selective agonists zaleplon (ED(50) = 0.78 mg/kg) and zolpidem (ED(50) = 1.73 mg/kg) substituted for midazolam. The discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam, zaleplon, and zolpidem were antagonized by beta-CCt (1.0-5.6 mg/kg, s.c.), and the effects of zaleplon and zolpidem were also antagonized by flumazenil (0.01-0.32 mg/kg, s.c.). Schild analyses supported the notion of a simple, competitive interaction between beta-CCt and midazolam (slope = -1.08; apparent pA(2) = 5.41) or zaleplon (slope = -1.57; apparent pA(2) = 5.49) and not between beta-CCt and zolpidem. Schild analyses also were consistent with a simple, competitive interaction between flumazenil and zaleplon (slope = -1.03; apparent pA(2) = 7.45) or zolpidem (slope = -1.11; apparent pA(2) = 7.63). These results suggest that the same BZ receptor subtype(s) mediate(s) the effects of midazolam, zolpidem, and zaleplon under these conditions and that selective binding of BZ ligands does not necessarily confer selective effects in vivo.
采用药物辨别实验来研究苯二氮䓬(BZ)(1)受体选择性配体对恒河猴的影响。在接受地西泮治疗(5.6毫克/千克,口服)的猴子中辨别非选择性BZ拮抗剂氟马西尼(0.32毫克/千克,皮下注射)时,BZ(1)选择性拮抗剂β-咔啉-3-羧酸叔丁酯(β-CCt)可替代氟马西尼。在注射后2小时,用5.6毫克/千克的β-CCt替代氟马西尼时,β-CCt的起效延迟。在辨别非选择性BZ激动剂咪达唑仑(0.56毫克/千克,皮下注射)的猴子中,BZ(1)选择性激动剂扎来普隆(ED(50)=0.78毫克/千克)和唑吡坦(ED(50)=1.73毫克/千克)可替代咪达唑仑。β-CCt(1.0 - 5.6毫克/千克,皮下注射)可拮抗咪达唑仑、扎来普隆和唑吡坦的辨别性刺激效应,氟马西尼(0.01 - 0.32毫克/千克,皮下注射)也可拮抗扎来普隆和唑吡坦的效应。希尔德分析支持了β-CCt与咪达唑仑(斜率 = -1.08;表观pA(2)=5.41)或扎来普隆(斜率 = -1.57;表观pA(2)=5.49)之间存在简单竞争性相互作用的观点,而β-CCt与唑吡坦之间不存在这种相互作用。希尔德分析还与氟马西尼和扎来普隆(斜率 = -