Sinsheimer J S, McKenzie C A, Keavney B, Lange K
Department of Human Genetics and Biomathematics, The University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1766, USA.
Ann Hum Genet. 2001 Sep;65(Pt 5):483-90. doi: 10.1017/S0003480001008843.
The gamete competition model is a likelihood version of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) that is inspired by conditional logistic regression and the Bradley-Terry ranking procedure. In family-based association studies, both the TDT and the gamete competition model apply directly to data on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Because any given SNP has limited polymorphism, it is tempting to collect several SNPs within a gene into a single super marker whose alleles are haplotypes. Unfortunately, this tactic wreaks havoc with the traditional TDT, which requires codominant markers (Spielman et al. 1993; Terwilliger & Ott, 1992). Eliminating phase ambiguities by assigning haplotypes to individuals before conducting the TDT may give misleading results because only the most probable haplotypes are then considered. Because pedigree implementations of the gamete competition model can accommodate dominant as well as codominant markers, they circumvent the phase problem by including all possible phases weighted by their estimated frequencies.
配子竞争模型是一种似然性版本的传递不平衡检验(TDT),它受到条件逻辑回归和布拉德利-特里排序程序的启发。在基于家系的关联研究中,TDT和配子竞争模型都直接应用于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)数据。由于任何给定的SNP具有有限的多态性,因此人们倾向于将一个基因内的几个SNP收集到一个单一的超级标记中,其等位基因是单倍型。不幸的是,这种策略对传统的TDT造成了严重破坏,传统TDT需要共显性标记(斯皮尔曼等人,1993年;特威利格和奥特,1992年)。在进行TDT之前通过为个体分配单倍型来消除相位模糊性可能会给出误导性结果,因为那时只考虑了最可能的单倍型。由于配子竞争模型的系谱实现可以容纳显性和共显性标记,它们通过纳入所有可能的相位并根据其估计频率加权来规避相位问题。