Bolender C J, Chemouni-Benayoun S
Orthod Fr. 2001 Dec;72(4):387-93.
If incisor overbite in the matter of orthodontic treatment entails difficulties with the appliances due to excessive overbite of the incisors, involving an anterior bite raiser to enable the unlocking of the occlusion and the bonding of the brackets on the anterior mandibular teeth poses the problem of the vertical behavior of the masticatory apparatus during treatment. A profile teleradiograph was therefore taken at the beginning of treatment and again once the occlusion had been lifted due to the presence of the bite raiser and within a period of three months. The sample was separated in two groups according to the value of FMA; a first group was composed of 44 cases exhibiting an FMA angle inferior to 25 degrees therefore similar to the cases analyzed by Dake and Sinclair in 1989, called "reference group" and a group of cases exhibiting an FMA angle superior to 25 degrees. The aim of this study is indeed to confront, as regards vertical behavior, the therapeutic approach of the authors with the one studied by Dake and Sinclair dealing with cases treated with Ricketts and Tweed technique (Schudy modified). Following Dake and Sinclair's approach, the authors managed to find out in cases with FMA inferior to 25 degrees that the vertical alterations in the study group were not different from those in the reference group. This means that in spite of the presence of an anterior bite raiser the mandibular plane angle had only increased by 1.8 degree, compared to 1.8 degree for the Ricketts group and 1.1 degree for the Tweed/Schudy group. As for the study sample with an FMA angle superior to 25 degrees, the vertical alterations in the study group show an increase of the angle of the mandibular plane equal to 1.2 degree, here again the increase is similar to the one observed in the reference group. It can thus be concluded that the use of an anterior bite raiser in conjunction with the Tip-Edge technique is not only advisable but strongly recommended both to unlock the occlusion but also to enable bracket bonding at the very beginning of treatment.
在正畸治疗中,如果由于切牙过度覆合导致矫治器使用困难,使用前牙咬合升高器来打开咬合以及在下颌前牙上粘结托槽,会引发治疗过程中咀嚼器官垂直方向变化的问题。因此,在治疗开始时拍摄了一张侧面远中曲面断层片,在由于咬合升高器打开咬合后以及三个月内又再次拍摄。根据FMA值将样本分为两组;第一组由44例FMA角小于25度的病例组成,因此类似于1989年Dake和Sinclair分析的病例,称为“参照组”,另一组病例的FMA角大于25度。本研究的目的实际上是在垂直方向变化方面,将作者的治疗方法与Dake和Sinclair研究的、采用Ricketts和Tweed技术(Schudy改良)治疗的病例的方法进行对比。按照Dake和Sinclair的方法,作者发现在FMA小于25度的病例中,研究组的垂直变化与参照组并无差异。这意味着尽管使用了前牙咬合升高器,下颌平面角仅增加了1.8度,相比之下,Ricketts组增加了1.8度,Tweed/Schudy组增加了1.1度。至于FMA角大于25度的研究样本,研究组的垂直变化显示下颌平面角增加了1.2度,同样,这种增加与参照组观察到的情况相似。因此可以得出结论,在前牙咬合升高器结合Tip-Edge技术使用,不仅是可取的,而且强烈推荐,这既能打开咬合,又能在治疗开始时实现托槽粘结。