Lotsch Jorn, Skarke Carsten, Tegeder Irmgard, Geisslinger Gerd
Pharmazentrum Frankfurt, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, Germany.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(1):31-57. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241010-00004.
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has become standard procedure in the clinical treatment of pain. Its widespread use in patients with all kinds of diseases opens a variety of possible interactions between analgesics used for PCA and other drugs that might be administered concomitantly to the patient. Many of these drug interactions are of little clinical importance. However, some drug interactions have been reported to result in serious clinical problems. Drug interactions can either predominantly affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the drug. Most important pharmacokinetic drug interactions occur at the level of drug metabolism or protein binding. Acceleration of methadone metabolism caused by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 induction by antiretroviral drugs or rifampicin (rifampin) has caused methadone withdrawal symptoms. Lack of morphine formation from codeine as a result of CYP2D6 inhibition by quinidine results in an almost complete loss of the analgesic effects of codeine. Alterations of methadone protein binding caused by an inhibition of alpha1-acid glycoprotein synthesis by alkylating substances are another possibility for predominantly pharmacokinetically based drug interactions during PCA. Furthermore, inhibition of P-glycoprotein by anticancer drugs could result in altered transmembrane transport of morphine, methadone or fentanyl, although this has not been shown to be of clinical relevance. Synergistic effects of systemically administered opioids with spinally or topically delivered opioids or anaesthetics have been reported frequently. The same is true for the opioid-sparing effects of coadministered non-opioid analgesics. Antidepressants, anticonvulsants or alpha2-adrenoreceptor agonists have also been shown to exert additive analgesic effects when administered together with an opioid. Inconsistent findings, however, are reported regarding the treatment of patients with opioid-induced nausea and sedation, since coadministration of antiemetics either increased or decreased the respective adverse effects or revealed additional unwanted drug effects.
患者自控镇痛(PCA)已成为疼痛临床治疗的标准方法。它在各类疾病患者中的广泛应用引发了PCA所用镇痛药与可能同时给予患者的其他药物之间的多种潜在相互作用。其中许多药物相互作用在临床上意义不大。然而,据报道一些药物相互作用会导致严重的临床问题。药物相互作用主要可影响药物的药代动力学或药效动力学。最重要的药代动力学药物相互作用发生在药物代谢或蛋白结合水平。抗逆转录病毒药物或利福平(利福霉素)诱导细胞色素P450(CYP)3A4导致美沙酮代谢加速,已引发美沙酮戒断症状。奎尼丁抑制CYP2D6导致可待因无法形成吗啡,几乎完全丧失了可待因的镇痛效果。烷基化物质抑制α1-酸性糖蛋白合成导致美沙酮蛋白结合改变,是PCA期间主要基于药代动力学的药物相互作用的另一种可能情况。此外,抗癌药物抑制P-糖蛋白可能导致吗啡、美沙酮或芬太尼的跨膜转运改变,尽管这尚未被证明具有临床相关性。全身给药的阿片类药物与脊髓或局部给药的阿片类药物或麻醉剂的协同作用屡有报道。联合使用非阿片类镇痛药的阿片类药物节省效应也是如此。抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药或α2-肾上腺素能受体激动剂与阿片类药物同时使用时也显示出相加的镇痛作用。然而,关于阿片类药物引起的恶心和镇静患者的治疗,报道结果并不一致,因为同时使用止吐药要么增加要么减少了各自的不良反应,或者显示出其他不良药物效应。