Tumor growth potential after tumoral and instrumental contamination: an in-vivo comparative study of T-saw, Gigli saw, and scalpel.

In the field of spinal tumors, intralesional tumor cutting is sometimes inevitable. The purpose of this study was to compare the potential for tumor growth after intralesional cutting by T-saw, Gigli saw, and scalpel. Tumors, prepared by the subcutaneous injection of human HT 1080 fibrosarcoma cells in nude mice, were harvested and cut with a T-saw, Gigli saw, or scalpel. A 3-cm wound was created in the skin on the back in another group of nude mice. The cut surface of the tumor was rubbed for 10 s against the subcutaneous tissue in this second group of nude mice. In the same manner, the instrument used for tumor cutting was rubbed against the subcutaneous tissue in the 3-cm wound in the back of a third group of nude mice for 10 s. Other instruments used for tumor cutting were immediately washed in culture medium, and the total number of tumor cells was counted. Tumor blocks and single-cell suspensions prepared from tumor tissues of the same weight were inoculated and injected into a fourth group of nude mice. The incidence of tumor growth after the rubbing of the subcutaneous tissue with the tumor surface cut with a T-saw, Gigli saw, and scalpel was 16.7%, 50.0%, and 33.3%, respectively. The corresponding figures after the rubbing of the subcutaneous tissue with a T-saw, Gigli saw, and scalpel was 16.7%, 33.3%, and 33.3%, respectively. The mean numbers of tumor cells attached to the T-saw, Gigli saw, and scalpel were 1.88 x 105, 5.02 x 105, and 4.92 x 105, respectively. Finally, the incidence of tumor growth after the inoculation of tumor blocks and single-cell suspensions was 100% and 77.8%, respectively. These findings show that tumor recurrence is less likely after intralesional tumor cutting with a T-saw than after such cutting with a Gigli saw or scalpel.