Suppr超能文献

一项旨在改善接受根治性前列腺切除术患者前列腺病理报告的合作教育项目的结果。

Results of a cooperative educational program to improve prostate pathology reports among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Imperato Pascal James, Waisman Jerry, Wallen Marcia, Pryor Veronica, Rojas Mary, Giardelli Kathleen, Daley Maryanne

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2002 Feb;27(1):1-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1013823409165.

Abstract

The information contained in pathology reports of radical prostatectomy specimens is critically important to treating physicians for the selection of adjuvant therapy, the evaluation of therapy, estimating prognosis, and analyzing outcomes. This information is also important to patients and their families. The first phase of this study consisted of a retrospective chart review of 554 cases of radical prostatectomy (ICD-9-CM procedure code of 60.5) in New York State for the second six-month period of 1996. This review focused on ten elements (quality indicators): submission of a frozen section, location of the adenocarcinoma, proportion of specimen involved by adenocarcinoma, perineural involvement, vascular involvement, seminal vesicle status, periprostate fat status, number of nodes submitted, status of nodes, and PIN (prostate intra-epithelial neoplasia). The second phase of this project consisted of an educational feedback program involving the directors of pathology laboratories in all hospitals in New York State. A post-intervention review of the medical charts of all male Medicare patients discharged from New York State acute care hospitals with the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 60.5 (radical prostatectomy) was conducted for the six-month period February 1 through July 31, 1999. A total of 304 charts were reviewed. Performance on the ten indicators in the first phase of the study varied from 14.8% (periprostate fat status) to 85.9% (seminal vesicle involvement). Performance for all hospitals was 50% for four quality indicators and less than 70% for seven. Post-intervention improvements in performance occurred with nine of the ten quality indicators. These improvements ranged from 1.4% (status of lymph nodes submitted) to 23.9% (proportion of specimen involved by adenocarcinoma). The results of this study demonstrate that the issues identified in the baseline with radical prostatectomy pathology reports were amenable to a cooperative educational intervention.

摘要

根治性前列腺切除术标本的病理报告所含信息对于治疗医生选择辅助治疗、评估治疗效果、预估预后以及分析结果至关重要。该信息对患者及其家属也很重要。本研究的第一阶段包括对1996年纽约州下半年554例根治性前列腺切除术(ICD - 9 - CM手术编码为60.5)病例进行回顾性图表审查。该审查聚焦于十个要素(质量指标):冰冻切片的提交情况、腺癌的位置、腺癌累及标本的比例、神经周围侵犯情况、血管侵犯情况、精囊状态、前列腺周围脂肪状态、送检淋巴结数量、淋巴结状态以及前列腺上皮内瘤变(PIN)。本项目的第二阶段包括一个教育反馈项目,涉及纽约州所有医院的病理实验室主任。对1999年2月1日至7月31日这六个月期间从纽约州急性护理医院出院的所有男性医疗保险患者(ICD - 9 - CM手术编码为60.5,即根治性前列腺切除术)的病历进行了干预后审查。共审查了304份病历。研究第一阶段十个指标的表现从14.8%(前列腺周围脂肪状态)到85.9%(精囊受累情况)不等。所有医院四个质量指标的表现为50%,七个指标的表现低于70%。十个质量指标中有九个在干预后表现有所改善。这些改善幅度从1.4%(送检淋巴结状态)到23.9%(腺癌累及标本的比例)不等。本研究结果表明,根治性前列腺切除术病理报告基线中识别出 的问题适合通过合作性教育干预来解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验