Cornblatt Barbara, Lencz Todd, Obuchowski Michael
Department of Psychiatry Research, Hillside Hospital of the North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, 75-59 263rd Street, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2002 Mar 1;54(1-2):177-86. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00365-6.
Interest in the prodromal stage of schizophrenia-the stage directly preceding the onset of psychosis-has recently undergone a dramatic increase. To a great extent, this has resulted from the convergence of two very different research traditions. Many treatment researchers have moved from a concern with symptom control to an interest in prevention and view the prodrome as the optimal stage to begin intervention with anti-psychotics. High-risk researchers, who view the identification of accurate risk factors as necessarily preceding preventive programs, have begun to move from the premorbid to the prodromal phase as the most effective starting point. Thus, researchers in both traditions have targeted the schizophrenia prodrome as the most likely gateway to prevention. However, clashes between the two traditions in approaches, methodology and research goals have also led to considerable controversy. Such issues as how best to define the prodrome, what the actual risk for schizophrenia is among prodromal individuals, and what type of medication should be used remain largely unresolved. The Hillside Recognition and Prevention (RAP) Program has been designed to address many of these and related questions. Within a naturalistic treatment framework, the RAP program combines both high-risk and treatment research strategies. Preliminary findings from a 3-year RAP pilot study, for example, suggest that the prodrome is a developmentally complex phase of schizophrenia, that it consists of distinctly different subgroups and that novel anti-psychotics are clearly beneficial for some but not all individuals. Depending upon clinical characteristics and phase of the prodrome, anti-depressants also appear highly effective.
对精神分裂症前驱期(即精神病发作之前的阶段)的关注最近急剧增加。在很大程度上,这是两种截然不同的研究传统融合的结果。许多治疗研究人员已从关注症状控制转向对预防的兴趣,并将前驱期视为开始使用抗精神病药物进行干预的最佳阶段。高危研究人员认为准确识别风险因素必然先于预防计划,他们已开始从前兆期转向前驱期,将其作为最有效的起点。因此,这两种传统的研究人员都将精神分裂症前驱期作为最有可能实现预防的切入点。然而,这两种传统在方法、方法论和研究目标上的冲突也引发了相当大的争议。诸如如何最好地定义前驱期、前驱期个体患精神分裂症的实际风险是什么以及应该使用何种类型的药物等问题在很大程度上仍未得到解决。希尔斯代尔识别与预防(RAP)计划旨在解决许多此类及相关问题。在自然主义治疗框架内,RAP计划结合了高危和治疗研究策略。例如,一项为期3年的RAP试点研究的初步结果表明,前驱期是精神分裂症一个发育复杂的阶段,它由明显不同的亚组组成,新型抗精神病药物对某些个体明显有益,但并非对所有个体都有益。根据前驱期的临床特征和阶段,抗抑郁药似乎也非常有效。