Suppr超能文献

软组织肉瘤中的DNA倍体:93例患者流式细胞术和图像细胞术与临床随访结果的比较

DNA ploidy in soft tissue sarcoma: comparison of flow and image cytometry with clinical follow-up in 93 patients.

作者信息

Dreinhöfer Karsten E, Baldetorp Bo, Akerman Måns, Fernö Mårten, Rydholm Anders, Gustafson Pelle

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Cytometry. 2002 Feb 15;50(1):19-24.

Abstract

In soft tissue sarcoma, the prognostic importance of DNA ploidy status is limited. One possible explanation may be technical; small non-diploid stemlines will be diluted in relation to the presence of normal diploid cells and may not be detected by flow cytometry (FCM). We assessed DNA ploidy status in 93 tumors with both FCM and image cytometry (ICM). ICM may permit the exclusion of non-relevant cells. The ability of the two methods to detect non-diploid stemlines was compared, as were the prognostic consequences. The patients (54 males) had a median age of 69 years. Surgical procedures were performed on all patients. None of the patients had received preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. FCM and ICM were performed with standard methods. The prognostic value was assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis. In 82 of the 93 tumors, a concordant ploidy status by FCM and ICM was found. In 5 FCM type 1-2 tumors (diploid), the identification of non-diploid stemlines by ICM did not influence the metastatic rates. Increasing tumor size, histotype other than liposarcoma, increasing malignancy grade, tumor necrosis, and ICM non-diploidy were univariate prognostic factors for metastasis. In a multivariate analysis, only tumor size larger than 9 cm was a prognostic factor. In about 10% of the tumors, a discrepancy between FCM and ICM ploidy status was found, but we could not find a consistent prognostic consequence of this. Neither FCM nor ICM ploidy status was an independent prognostic factor.

摘要

在软组织肉瘤中,DNA倍体状态的预后重要性有限。一种可能的解释或许是技术方面的;相对于正常二倍体细胞的存在,小的非二倍体干细胞系会被稀释,可能无法通过流式细胞术(FCM)检测到。我们使用FCM和图像细胞术(ICM)评估了93例肿瘤的DNA倍体状态。ICM或许可以排除不相关的细胞。比较了两种方法检测非二倍体干细胞系的能力以及预后结果。患者(54名男性)的中位年龄为69岁。所有患者均接受了外科手术。所有患者术前均未接受放疗或化疗。FCM和ICM采用标准方法进行。通过单因素和多因素分析评估预后价值。在93例肿瘤中的82例中,FCM和ICM检测到的倍体状态一致。在5例FCM 1-2型(二倍体)肿瘤中,ICM鉴定出的非二倍体干细胞系并未影响转移率。肿瘤大小增加、除脂肪肉瘤外的组织学类型、恶性程度增加、肿瘤坏死以及ICM非二倍体是转移的单因素预后因素。在多因素分析中,只有肿瘤大小大于9 cm是一个预后因素。在约10%的肿瘤中,发现FCM和ICM倍体状态存在差异,但我们未发现其一致的预后结果。FCM和ICM的倍体状态均不是独立的预后因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验