相似文献
1
C-section guidelines offer benchmarks, easier rate standardization.
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res. 2000 Oct 26;11(21):6-7.
2
Adherence to guidelines on the management of dystocia and cesarean section rates.
Am J Perinatol. 2007 May;24(5):271-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-976547. Epub 2007 May 4.
3
Does standardization of care through clinical guidelines improve outcomes and reduce medical liability?
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1022-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f97c62.
4
L.A. County learns costly lesson on mandated labor guidelines.
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1998 Apr;10(4):18-9.
5
Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Jun;89(6):735-40.
6
C-section rebirth. Procedure making strong comeback after a decade.
Mod Healthc. 2002 Jul 8;32(27):18.
7
The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit.
Pract Midwife. 2000 Jun;3(6):34-5.
8
Trial of labor compared with an elective second cesarean section.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 27;336(9):659.
9
Data benchmarks. Experts urge open discussion about cesarean section rates.
Clin Resour Manag. 2000 Sep;1(9):141-3, 129.
10
Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):452; author reply 452. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000232163.87409.27.
Zotero 插件