Hansen Lars Jørgen, Drivsholm Thomas B
Central Forskningsenhed for Almen Praksis og Afdeling for Almen Medicin, Panum Instituttet, Københavns Universitet, DK-2200 København N.
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jan 28;164(5):607-9.
This review should be cited as: Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S. Wagner EH, Eijk JThM van, Assendelft WJJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2001. Oxford: Update Software. A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 29 June 2000. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary.
Diabetes is a common chronic disease that is increasingly managed in primary care. Different systems have been proposed to manage diabetes care.
To assess the effects of different interventions, targeted at health professionals or the structure in which they deliver care, on the management of patients with diabetes in primary care, outpatient and community settings.
We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4 1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), Cinahl (1982-1999), and reference lists of articles.
Randomised trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), controlled before and after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITS) analyses of professional, financial and organisational strategies aimed at improving care for people with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes. The participants were health care professionals, including physicians, nurses and pharmacists. The outcomes included objectively measured health professional performance or patient outcomes, and self-report measures with known validity and reliability.
Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.
Forty-one studies were included involving more than 200 practices and 48,000 patients. Twenty-seven studies were RCTs, 12 were CBAs, and two were ITS. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of interventions, participants, settings and outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was often poor. In all studies the intervention strategy was multifaceted. In 12 studies the interventions were targeted at health professionals, in nine they were targeted at the organization of care, and 20 studies targeted both. In 15 studies patient education was added to the professional and organisational interventions. A combination of professional interventions improved process outcomes. The effect on patient outcomes remained less clear as these were rarely assessed. Arrangements for follow-up (organisational intervention) also showed a favourable effect on process outcomes. Multiple interventions in which patient education was added or in which the role of the nurse was enhanced also reported favourable effects on patients' health outcomes. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSION: Multifaceted professional interventions can enhance the performance of health professionals in managing patients with diabetes. Organisational interventions that improve regular prompted recall and review of patients (central computerised tracking systems or nurses who regularly contact the patient) can also improve diabetes management. The addition of patient-oriented interventions can lead to improved patient health outcomes. Nurses can play an important role in patient-oriented interventions, through patient education or facilitating adherence to treatment.
本综述应引用为:Renders CM、Valk GD、Griffin S、Wagner EH、Eijk JThM van、Assendelft WJJ。改善初级保健、门诊和社区环境中糖尿病管理的干预措施(Cochrane综述)。载于:《Cochrane图书馆》,2001年第2期。牛津:更新软件公司。本系统综述的实质性修订于2000年6月29日完成。Cochrane综述会定期检查并在必要时更新。
糖尿病是一种常见的慢性病,越来越多地在初级保健中进行管理。已提出不同的系统来管理糖尿病护理。
评估针对卫生专业人员或其提供护理的结构的不同干预措施对初级保健、门诊和社区环境中糖尿病患者管理的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane有效实践与护理组织小组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验注册库(1999年第4期)、MEDLINE(1966 - 1999年)、EMBASE(1980 - 1999年)、Cinahl(1982 - 1999年)以及文章的参考文献列表。
针对旨在改善1型或2型糖尿病患者护理的专业、财务和组织策略的随机试验(RCT)、对照临床试验(CCT)、前后对照研究(CBA)和中断时间序列(ITS)分析。参与者为卫生保健专业人员,包括医生、护士和药剂师。结局包括客观测量的卫生专业人员表现或患者结局,以及具有已知效度和信度的自我报告测量。
两名综述作者独立提取数据并评估研究质量。
纳入41项研究,涉及200多个医疗实践机构和48000名患者。27项研究为随机试验,12项为前后对照研究,2项为中断时间序列分析。这些研究在干预措施、参与者、环境和结局方面存在异质性。研究的方法学质量通常较差。在所有研究中,干预策略都是多方面的。12项研究中的干预措施针对卫生专业人员,9项针对护理组织,20项同时针对两者。15项研究在专业和组织干预措施中增加了患者教育。专业干预措施的组合改善了过程结局。对患者结局的影响仍不太明确,因为这些很少被评估。随访安排(组织干预)也对过程结局显示出有利影响。增加患者教育或加强护士作用的多种干预措施也报告了对患者健康结局的有利影响。综述作者结论:多方面的专业干预措施可以提高卫生专业人员管理糖尿病患者的表现。改善对患者的定期提醒召回和复查的组织干预措施(中央计算机化跟踪系统或定期联系患者的护士)也可以改善糖尿病管理。增加以患者为导向的干预措施可导致患者健康结局得到改善。护士可以通过患者教育或促进治疗依从性在以患者为导向的干预措施中发挥重要作用。