Kerkhoffs G M M J, Struijs P A A, Raaymakers E L F B, Marti R K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002 Mar;122(2):102-5. doi: 10.1007/s004020100312. Epub 2002 Jan 4.
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome for patients treated with walking cast immobilization and wrap early mobilization after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A total of 39 consecutive patients with complete ruptures of the Achilles tendon were identified, treated, and functionally rehabilitated with either a walking cast or a wrap. Because the randomization was quasi-random, chi-square and t-tests were performed to compare the baseline characteristics. A statistically significant difference was present only for the injured side ( p<0.05). Therefore, groups were considered comparable for analysis of outcome. All patients were evaluated at an average follow-up of 6.7 years (range 5-8 years). Functional postoperative treatment with a wrap allowed a significantly shorter hospital stay ( p<0.05) as well as a shorter period to return to pre-injury sports level ( p<0.01) compared with treatment with a walking cast. According to the modified Rupp score, 91.3% of patients in the walking cast group had a good or excellent result, as did 93.8% in the wrap group ( p=0.9). Slight atrophy of the calf muscles was reported in 3 patients in the walking cast group (13.0%) and in 4 in the wrap group (25.0%). One re-rupture was reported in the walking cast group (4.3%). Functional treatment after surgical Achilles tendon repair is safe, and there is no increased risk of re-rupture or wound healing problems. Functional treatment with a wrap is preferable to treatment with a walking cast with respect to hospitalization time and return to sports.
本研究旨在比较急性跟腱断裂手术修复后采用行走石膏固定与包扎早期活动治疗的患者的临床疗效。共确定了39例连续性跟腱完全断裂患者,分别采用行走石膏或包扎进行治疗及功能康复。由于随机分组为半随机,故采用卡方检验和t检验比较基线特征。仅患侧存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。因此,在分析疗效时认为两组具有可比性。所有患者平均随访6.7年(范围5 - 8年)。与行走石膏治疗相比,包扎术后功能治疗可显著缩短住院时间(p<0.05)以及恢复到伤前运动水平的时间(p<0.01)。根据改良的Rupp评分,行走石膏组91.3%的患者结果为良好或优秀,包扎组为93.8%(p = 0.9)。行走石膏组有3例患者(13.0%)报告小腿肌肉轻度萎缩,包扎组有4例(25.0%)。行走石膏组报告1例再断裂(4.3%)。跟腱手术修复后的功能治疗是安全的,再断裂或伤口愈合问题的风险没有增加。就住院时间和恢复运动而言,包扎功能治疗优于行走石膏治疗。