Suppr超能文献

[丙泊酚与丁丙诺啡用于全静脉麻醉时的血流动力学变化及剂量需求]

[The changes in hemodynamics and dose requirements in total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and buprenorphine].

作者信息

Tabuchi Yachiyo

机构信息

Division of Anesthesia, Nagahama City Hospital, Nagahama 526-8580.

出版信息

Masui. 2002 Feb;51(2):157-61.

Abstract

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the changes in hemodynamics and dose requirements in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol and buprenorphine without (Group S: spinal surgery (3-6 h), n = 8, 28-79 Y) or with (Group A: abdominal surgery (5-10 h), n = 15, 36-83 Y) epidural anesthesia. All patients were premedicated with midazolam i.m. (2-5 mg). Anesthesia was maintained with a single dose of buprenorphine (Group S: 1.9 +/- 0.4 micrograms.kg-1, Group A: 2.0 +/- 0.5 micrograms.kg-1), propofol infusion and vecuronium with 40% oxygen in air. Group A was supplemented with continuous epidural anesthesia using 2% mepivacaine. In Group A, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate remained stable after the start of surgery. However, in Group S, 2 hours after the start of surgery MAP increased (P < 0.05) and remained elevated (P < 0.05) at higher levels than those in Group A. The maintenance dose of propofol in Group A (4.0 +/- 1.1 mg.kg-1.h-1) was significantly smaller than in Group S (6.5 +/- 0.9 mg.kg-1.h-1). In both groups, infusion rates of propofol were unchanged from 1 hour after the start to the end of surgery. Infusion rates of mepivacaine (5.2 +/- 0.9 ml.h-1) were unchanged following the increase 2 hours after the start of surgery. Awakening times were within 25 min (Group S 11.3 +/- 7.2 min vs Group A 14.7 +/- 7.3 min). There was no awareness during anesthesia in either group. The results suggest that additional continuous epidural anesthesia in TIVA would be useful to reduce propofol dose, to stabilize hemodynamic state and to obtain rapid recovery in anesthesia of long duration.

摘要

进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估在使用丙泊酚和丁丙诺啡的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)中,不使用硬膜外麻醉(S组:脊柱手术(3 - 6小时),n = 8,年龄28 - 79岁)或使用硬膜外麻醉(A组:腹部手术(5 - 10小时),n = 15,年龄36 - 83岁)时血流动力学和剂量需求的变化。所有患者均肌内注射咪达唑仑(2 - 5毫克)进行术前用药。麻醉维持采用单次剂量的丁丙诺啡(S组:1.9±0.4微克·千克⁻¹,A组:2.0±0.5微克·千克⁻¹)、丙泊酚输注以及维库溴铵,并吸入含40%氧气的空气。A组使用2%甲哌卡因补充连续硬膜外麻醉。在A组中,手术开始后平均动脉压(MAP)和心率保持稳定。然而,在S组中,手术开始2小时后MAP升高(P < 0.05),并一直维持在高于A组的较高水平(P < 0.05)。A组丙泊酚的维持剂量(4.0±1.1毫克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹)显著低于S组(6.5±0.9毫克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹)。在两组中,从手术开始1小时到结束,丙泊酚的输注速率均未改变。手术开始2小时后甲哌卡因输注速率增加,之后保持不变(5.2±0.9毫升·小时⁻¹)。苏醒时间在25分钟内(S组11.3±7.2分钟 vs A组14.7±7.3分钟)。两组在麻醉期间均未出现知晓情况。结果表明,在全静脉麻醉中额外使用连续硬膜外麻醉有助于减少丙泊酚剂量、稳定血流动力学状态并在长时间麻醉后实现快速苏醒。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验