McKenna F, Arguelles L, Burke T, Lefkowith J, Geis G S
Rheumatic Diseases Unit, Trafford General Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Jan-Feb;20(1):35-43.
To compare the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tolerability of celecoxib (a cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitor) and diclofenac using data from three randomised, double-blind clinical trials in osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Patients in two OA studies received either celecoxib 100 mg BID (n = 545), diclofenac 50 mg BID or TID (n = 540), or placebo (n = 200) for 6 weeks. In the RA study, patients received celecoxib 200 mg BID (n = 326) or diclofenac 75 mg BID (n = 329) for 24 weeks. The cumulative incidence of abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea or any of these events (UGI tolerability composite endpoint) after the first 6 weeks was estimated using time-to-event analysis.
In the pooled OA trials, the cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher with diclofenac (17.6%; 95% CI: 14.4-20.9%) than celecoxib (11.1%; 95% CI: 8.4-13.8%; p = 0.002) and comparable with placebo (13.3%; 95% CI: 8.1-18.4%; p = 0.157). In the PA trial, the cumulative incidence of the UGI tolerability composite endpoint was also significantly higher with diclofenac (20.7%; 95% CI: 16.3-25.1%) than celecoxib (15.9%; 95% CI: 11.9-20.0%; p = 0.013). Celecoxib was also better tolerated than diclofenac in this trial in terms of the cumulative incidences of abdominal pain (p = 0.031) and dyspepsia (p = 0.062). The results of the UGI tolerability composite endpoint analysis were confirmed using the Cox proportional hazards model to controlfor other predictors of UGI adverse events.
The UGI tolerability of therapeutic dosages of celecoxib was significantly better than diclofenac in patients with RA or OA.
利用三项骨关节炎(OA)和类风湿关节炎(RA)随机双盲临床试验的数据,比较塞来昔布(一种环氧化酶-2特异性抑制剂)和双氯芬酸对上消化道(UGI)的耐受性。
两项OA研究中的患者接受塞来昔布100 mg每日两次(n = 545)、双氯芬酸50 mg每日两次或每日三次(n = 540)或安慰剂(n = 200)治疗6周。在RA研究中,患者接受塞来昔布200 mg每日两次(n = 326)或双氯芬酸75 mg每日两次(n = 329)治疗24周。使用事件发生时间分析估计前6周后腹痛、消化不良、恶心或这些事件中的任何一种(UGI耐受性复合终点)的累积发生率。
在汇总的OA试验中,双氯芬酸的复合终点累积发生率(17.6%;95%可信区间:14.4 - 20.9%)显著高于塞来昔布(11.1%;95%可信区间:8.4 - 13.8%;p = 0.002),与安慰剂相当(13.3%;95%可信区间:8.1 - 18.4%;p = 0.157)。在RA试验中,双氯芬酸的UGI耐受性复合终点累积发生率(20.7%;95%可信区间:16.3 - 25.1%)也显著高于塞来昔布(15.9%;95%可信区间:11.9 - 20.0%;p = 0.013)。在该试验中,就腹痛(p = 0.031)和消化不良(p = 0.062)的累积发生率而言,塞来昔布的耐受性也优于双氯芬酸。使用Cox比例风险模型控制UGI不良事件的其他预测因素后,UGI耐受性复合终点分析的结果得到证实。
在RA或OA患者中,塞来昔布治疗剂量的UGI耐受性显著优于双氯芬酸。